Re: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06

[Jari Arkko <[e-mail]>]

Joe, I think I agree with you. I was not planning on holding on to a 
Discuss for that part, however.

Jari

Joe Touch kirjoitti:
>
>
> On 10/15/2010 3:00 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
>> Joe,
>>
>> Just a quick response on one point:
>>
>>> - based on the note from Jari, I can't tell whether the
>>> doc is recommending SHOULD NOT for new apps or not
>>
>> My text did not change that aspect in any way. The new text is in the
>> introduction and has no keywords. The formal requirement is later in the
>> document. IIRC the current text there says SHOULD NOT for new apps.
>
> Correct. In that case, the note was not responsive to the thread I 
> raised discussing the point that this is a new and substantial change, 
> one that I feel suggests that the title, abstract, and overall 
> structure should be inverted to focus on SHOULD NOT as the key point.
>
> It's hard to understand a doc that basically focuses on a change to 
> the spec, and includes the SHOULD NOT almost parenthetically.
>
> Joe
>