IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Mon, 11 October 2010 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F673A6A6A for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qqPSZ54TCtQ0 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f194.google.com (mail-yx0-f194.google.com [209.85.213.194]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B763A6805 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxk8 with SMTP id 8so887511yxk.1 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DSsrcBZFTGHsk/82R+ZMHRh757y7hN3ZqpwVDyXfMx0=; b=lQ86jaceTWtbm18BwN92+egOLtpn3kvTutchORgD2XjYEzIV597OeGkEVgCZehq2Gd 5x2K1F+WnkdRWysIiHiQBUETJuR1WwpoZtYhqPDjAouZJXebh0lWr3M9OBsgm4CjMwwh LAYOFCVzhFJT4887BffWWp4Go5g5go/N8CWJY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=QFLb3EqyoEgAYFwjecovwit+eZz8rz1V6KT4H9OGdOSWHSlbH5D/RnN1u6V8cryoj4 WcAcFef65r8dk9XjUEVBhOAnXo24NmBzJNUeJDpejjAdD7ACROtCOPY7OEJNdbupwKIK aMhS2D7ut0enhojsi8xX+7ya8m/9gdeWnm0SM=
Received: by 10.100.195.15 with SMTP id s15mr1711591anf.124.1286807253587; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.123.100] ([190.48.248.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g6sm8807807anh.11.2010.10.11.07.27.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Fernando Gont <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4CB31ECF.6040307@gont.com.ar>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:27:27 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
References: <201009301549.RAA14282@TR-Sys.de> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B01839E20B@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <31679F6B-0ACA-421F-8131-DA05B764A4A9@nokia.com> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B0201C2D1C@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <FCF0200B-A1AF-4902-A110-D7EC08C39FEC@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <FCF0200B-A1AF-4902-A110-D7EC08C39FEC@nokia.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data.all@tools.ietf.org>, "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:26:23 -0000

Hi, Lars,

Thanks so much for following this one closely. Comments inline....

On 11/10/2010 05:17 a.m., Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2010-10-5, at 17:17, Ronald Bonica wrote:
>> I cleared, assuming that Jari would hold my discuss.
> 
> thanks, Ron.
> 
> Editors, chairs, WG: are we clear on what needs to happen to the ID
> to address the discuss? When will we see a revision?

It's clear that there are two different positions on this DISCUSS:
David's, and Jari/Ron's (probably shared by Joe, too). But it's not
clear to me whether I should simply modify the document as indicated by
Jari/Ron, or whether there's a middle-ground that could possibly make
both parties happy (I'm assuming that sticking to David's position is
not an option).

(FWIW, me, I agree with David's position... but for obvious reasons I
might be biased... hence my request for advice on how to proceed).

Thoughts?

Thanks!

Kind regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email