IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Wed, 20 October 2010 00:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94F43A690F for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.492
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.107, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FDuezSgOyLvH for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og123.obsmtp.com (exprod7og123.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4263F3A6976 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob123.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTL48aUaVXZd8T6WSiHsLopaDVfhL7NjI@postini.com; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:48:58 PDT
Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:46:01 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:46:00 -0400
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:45:58 -0400
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06
Thread-Index: Actv3CHEFMqbUCe7Tw64aJjjolTCAAAE/mLQ
Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B021143F22@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <201009301549.RAA14282@TR-Sys.de> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B01839E20B@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <31679F6B-0ACA-421F-8131-DA05B764A4A9@nokia.com> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B0201C2D1C@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <FCF0200B-A1AF-4902-A110-D7EC08C39FEC@nokia.com> <4CB31ECF.6040307@gont.com.ar>, <1D4E3C6E-B0BF-4CAC-A01E-EC9CDAC14EE0@nokia.com> <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB481FB1C732@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov> <4CB3CCBB.1030400@isi.edu> <675AC39A-0E6D-4014-850B-2A05389577C4@windriver.com> <4CB488F2.1070800@isi.edu> <4CB48DCE.7010606@isi.edu> <4CB8C1CF.1020106@piuha.net> <30410F46-8F64-4988-B6ED-73ECFB7F59E9@windriver.com> <4CB8CC43.8080305@isi.edu> <4CB8CEE1.8070408@piuha.net> <4CBE1739.6040203@isi.edu> <4CBE1853.9020502@piuha.net> <4CBE1A1B.6040306@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4CBE1A1B.6040306@isi.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, David Borman <david.borman@windriver.com>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:47:26 -0000

I cleared, letting Jari hold the DISCUSS.

             Ron


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Touch [mailto:touch@isi.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 6:22 PM
> To: Jari Arkko
> Cc: David Borman; tcpm@ietf.org Extensions; Fernando Gont
> Subject: Re: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06
> 
> Hmm. That was the issue that the discuss I thought that Ron was holding
> was focused on (see attached)
> 
> Ron?
> 
> Joe
> 
> On 10/19/2010 3:14 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> > Joe, I think I agree with you. I was not planning on holding on to a
> > Discuss for that part, however.
> >
> > Jari
> >
> > Joe Touch kirjoitti:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/15/2010 3:00 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> >>> Joe,
> >>>
> >>> Just a quick response on one point:
> >>>
> >>>> - based on the note from Jari, I can't tell whether the doc is
> >>>> recommending SHOULD NOT for new apps or not
> >>>
> >>> My text did not change that aspect in any way. The new text is in
> >>> the introduction and has no keywords. The formal requirement is
> >>> later in the document. IIRC the current text there says SHOULD NOT
> for new apps.
> >>
> >> Correct. In that case, the note was not responsive to the thread I
> >> raised discussing the point that this is a new and substantial
> >> change, one that I feel suggests that the title, abstract, and
> >> overall structure should be inverted to focus on SHOULD NOT as the
> key point.
> >>
> >> It's hard to understand a doc that basically focuses on a change to
> >> the spec, and includes the SHOULD NOT almost parenthetically.
> >>
> >> Joe
> >>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email