IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 29 September 2010 10:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDEF3A6C9E; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.443
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.443 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.156, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zBsWQlgLkdHN; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:43:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171643A6B2B; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:43:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6562CC3C; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:44:37 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ppZWwrS+XS1; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:44:37 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5AE2CC30; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:44:37 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4CA31894.2020902@piuha.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:44:36 +0300
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B0172D9C98@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <AANLkTinhgNi7vM7VAJ2JJkOTiMYrG1i1v1da2w9TPSzX@mail.gmail.com> <4C9C0A49.1000502@isi.edu> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B018164416@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <4757554A-B0A6-49D9-8A41-C887677840E6@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <4757554A-B0A6-49D9-8A41-C887677840E6@nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:43:56 -0000

Lars,

>> I think that you have hit the nail on the head. Reading through Sections 1-5, I thought that we were trying to fix the feature. Only in Section 6 did I realize that we really wanted to drive a stake through its heart.
>>
>> Maybe if we changed the title and added some test to the abstract and introduction, this would be better. Otherwise, people may spend time and money fixing the TCP Urgent option instead of just avoiding it.
>>     
>
> are the other IESG members with DISCUSSes (Jari & Tim) OK with this approach? If yes, would you consider having one AD hold the combined DISCUSS?
>   

I do agree that attempting to fix urgent data as opposed to indicating 
what's wrong with and recommending against its use is the root problem.

I already have a discuss on the document, I can volunteer to hold this 
viewpoint under that discuss as well.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email