IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Proposed text for removing renegotiation

James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> Fri, 30 May 2014 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <cloos@jhcloos.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0981A09D3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id csTBfgeG4RxQ for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ore.jhcloos.com (ore.jhcloos.com [198.147.23.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73E3B1A036A for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ore.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id BF0F51DF86; Fri, 30 May 2014 17:57:42 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=ore14; t=1401472662; bh=4cIIpejxu2PkQxMZeCcWeBkDuNT6qZaHT9cIOxvcTIs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=hVcDRyrovFkzRR9KtY6NH+XqAfPdSK1jdV18Onu9EitmqxbcGicDEmSqlt2TVZtHx ihPoMjWoyySd58plBGoZVdfIWNUf+AakaMJESQwd/8oFAzWn5dlNd/ziNhdEF+o9n6 TyoPsOuaXUrm3Lfp7RMRGj1zdNmHPKb6sheReR+s=
Received: by carbon.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id DCAD46001E; Fri, 30 May 2014 17:45:26 +0000 (UTC)
From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
To: Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <447419780.17071094.1401442563129.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (Hubert Kario's message of "Fri, 30 May 2014 05:36:03 -0400 (EDT)")
References: <CABkgnnXaLKmxXL01hQEdxHSNGt3nZQQNBLDD5H2LqBzTo3vK4g@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnW0YAhsbMoN0JSdWWpxt9TsOWpvq3c67cw8_eyt4mprbA@mail.gmail.com> <m2vbspv8w1.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <CABkgnnWfM8eDALtGmpHBeHScy21fzTqv8+C0ajnDhAO=OBziZg@mail.gmail.com> <1414735395.16311772.1401366314379.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <CABkgnnWqqEnayrgAwVA-x_O5rkvWjtcH+g=TpE1Ztmk_JvuNYg@mail.gmail.com> <739427058.16557109.1401382793847.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <m3mwe0i8as.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> <447419780.17071094.1401442563129.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQAgMAAABinRfyAAAACVBMVEX///8ZGXBQKKnCrDQ3 AAAAJElEQVQImWNgQAAXzwQg4SKASgAlXIEEiwsSIYBEcLaAtMEAADJnB+kKcKioAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC
Copyright: Copyright 2014 James Cloos
OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6; url=https://jhcloos.com/public_key/0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6.asc
OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 13:45:26 -0400
Message-ID: <m3sinrgnxs.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
Lines: 13
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Hashcash: 1:30:140530:hkario@redhat.com::ihU8zTbryS6T4JJM:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000AF5Wj
X-Hashcash: 1:30:140530:martin.thomson@gmail.com::VMD+HmToifWB/F+c:000000000000000000000000000000000000GtYwJ
X-Hashcash: 1:30:140530:geoffk@geoffk.org::MGqu0rnZ0JHqEDOT:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fjoYW
X-Hashcash: 1:30:140530:tls@ietf.org::Qp1bpLjpLi9RyCW7:00003R0hs
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/08C7K6nBAc68o_d03MUOtoUlmXg
Cc: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>, tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Proposed text for removing renegotiation
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 17:57:50 -0000

>>>>> "HK" == Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com> writes:

HK> That was the example of slowest performance for this, ...  all in
HK> software on a few year old hardware with encryption and decryption
HK> running in parallel.

I see.  The post gave the impression that it were intended as an example
on more recent hardware.  Although even a K10 is closer to 150 MB/s than
150 Mbit/s.

-JimC
--
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email