Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3
Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 21 January 2015 16:50 UTC
Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E664E1A1B24 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:50:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.066
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.066 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kalCeyTOQn6k for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a87.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A66B1A1B1E for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a87.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a87.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B0B26C06F; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:50:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=6F6s5WvqUTBYmZ pCnI8wODPWpUc=; b=tpSL6/lMszgYq1bYbHxTqgGixPRqcB/aZ9rBSoZvURYUr+ 1A9WCDdZCQ+fG54/c3pag+P3LuSPlpN9WXhtw7xZ8SF4CFhrK65hNUutM8m2ZvUE VJzBDgPxJgG1lN3B+CkRbmlhEuZshPETI/NhGwmAEqxhoi8K24V6gimsEpJbQ=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a87.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A612726C063; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:50:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:50:13 -0600
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Message-ID: <20150121165008.GQ2350@localhost>
References: <54B5501A.4070402@azet.org> <20150120191819.GA8165@typhoon.azet.org> <20150120193412.GA10140@typhoon.azet.org> <CABkgnnWSNtREGMYoT9nL9WWas5TZGqnW=qEcg9h_WvzMr8U8KQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150120225335.GA871@typhoon.azet.org> <CABkgnnWbFciZD=ja2bD+tZfFnniWWm=5zH5kL1x_UQEa4rbQ8w@mail.gmail.com> <20150121004704.GA15203@typhoon.azet.org> <54BFC326.4010302@azet.org> <CABcZeBMcsr7bnw8UmxesWC5fdiV==ZgfqoTYa-AmBmX6v5mKpw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMcsr7bnw8UmxesWC5fdiV==ZgfqoTYa-AmBmX6v5mKpw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/5UH5SeWsV_0d62qTiIYmCTCeJ-I>
Cc: TLS Mailing List <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:50:21 -0000
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 08:15:45AM -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org> wrote: > > Any comments on the idea of removing the following two ciphersuites from > > the draft? > > > > CipherSuite TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_AES_128_OCB = {TBD9, TBD9} > > CipherSuite TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_AES_256_OCB = {TBD10, TBD10} > > > > I don't see how these would be relevant to embedded devices. If DHE_PSK is relevant to an embedded device then all cipher+mode combinations might be as well. Obviously OCB wouldn't be required to implement, but that's no reason to exclude any one subset of ciphersuits using OCB. > If we generally think DHE_PSK is a good idea, is there a specific > reason why it wouldn't be a good idea for OCB? There isn't. Embedded devices need not implement the full set of suites. But really, this is once more about the gross inefficiency (in terms of registration as well as number of bytes used on the wire) of cartesian explosion ciphersuites. Can we fix this? Nico --
- [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Russ Housley
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Matt Caswell
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Matt Caswell
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Matt Caswell
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Paul Lambert
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Brian Smith
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Jacob Appelbaum
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Joachim Strömbergson
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Phillip Rogaway
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Alex Elsayed
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Jack Lloyd
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Nico Williams
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Henrik Grubbström
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Nico Williams
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Nico Williams
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Nico Williams
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Dmitry Belyavsky
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Jack Lloyd
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- [TLS] GOST in TLS (Re: Inclusion of OCB mode in T… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] GOST in TLS (Re: Inclusion of OCB mode … Dmitry Belyavsky
- Re: [TLS] GOST in TLS (Re: Inclusion of OCB mode … Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- [TLS] PSK [was: Re: Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS … Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Jack Lloyd
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Jack Lloyd
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Roland Zink
- Re: [TLS] Inclusion of OCB mode in TLS 1.3 Aaron Zauner