[TLS] Re: Composite ML-DSA

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 16 April 2026 06:11 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E224DD5D7AA for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1776319878; bh=ZIwY6ksjsB1RsAtc8UxhVSGt3uccahq5W5FQ8aOTxas=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=L2WQDz6kWYvNT5Wm2yZKuoejUv+QSK6Q+1BymB7F0irp6U2V78ySk9/jCqGF4Ml4z vy7mmKgc3SGrNXc5Kczn9mvDoTuwdcJ+22Rb10zCG8stuXHW8cn7Ll34L+N4Un7Gf+ NQh0UXh4qSMn7AOIP4rbn2rknCpwpA657+3nTDBM=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ydUFOKQL2UNQ for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aye.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (aye.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 804FEDD5D7A3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6824C168C; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 06:11:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a261.dreamhost.com (trex-green-6.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.105.39.15]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 320DC4C158D; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 06:11:10 +0000 (UTC)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; cv=none; t=1776319870; b=36KMfr9FfLh7ggp4fK6uEGsERF2441doWtBDoOR67jV7aCAOYVMO11R2T39cSRVN/xK4o6 WfDvLKodoQxQ9ovLyWKjsx23FfWh7rcALG1gmTSEPiYLIgLXc0cqk72ghZRoFp6dSrwOWH sdnkb14y8nCgj06QvHI0NRVJtzAbhqP/hvPMBzG3WPS2+ZjTC9W3Dz1/kWvbzuL+eMY3dv iqUCPotbeTExcuhCx/AzoST56e1JEinjckVH3TemkQZJnvZqe/jYmbci3JCLl3Gx8evK4f ssuvxnxp7jggtpEGLnU+qM3LPLp5IkrElL48u8CGSY6SSvzfp/ERbAb5LdO0Bg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1776319870; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=FJGIloK5OKFaFFknIXtEuGay0L3JXNxOqsCkMtDlP0w=; b=jIS0C88JgpN0tC3Ne2K/0V3qMlDvSvfgt/fMder2BZVE9V+TlRRGfsIhoaNZ+eHLbyC6+T d+NUrqk3t5d1soMMuCy8i4BGWaB3AncXyWfxqbaSLVcTn8o6svzrHcQ7aNZ84wThUfFkXz 4VNHFrXGSRXNUnu4fY2+Ku6goIpTVrAKcLmqHBFT7rzi9tc+qz8P3SH2uS/PTjE1YTcZDr K3z7x00ma25sC1+d0lMTPnueOfYdPFHrLr3Mvca4UO4sd9s6HQwoBEUj/Rsg3S980No2ix IZlwO0HJiYBojQaBQkMx6X9SVtOILC2iHrVVfamn0Tmow22QJ7UmJ+7z9U6+SQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-6c65dd77f-tt54h; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=nico@cryptonector.com
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Duck-Arithmetic: 4faed06b7294d603_1776319870412_1316116176
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1776319870412:3532332642
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1776319870411
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a261.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.105.39.15 (trex/7.1.5); Thu, 16 Apr 2026 06:11:10 +0000
Received: from ubby (unknown [75.81.95.64]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a261.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4fx71T5Q5pzypq; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; s=dreamhost; t=1776319870; bh=FJGIloK5OKFaFFknIXtEuGay0L3JXNxOqsCkMtDlP0w=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Content-Type; b=edmxvA9XHCxdV+mFgMnobh9h8XoreTFFt4xmovA8/m4UTdah/f01BGhdxBkKJDl93 xgj5QDSwVhC3pww3TKbO51F83GPA4y3yNlR49iiEN6vln6mYrR4FMmx39TljuKz+2y oywWAmmQobmwGFYNGzkLfGZ6waBsLJ93ZluMn8U1lQc7Ad4NwGTvbVcsD2Qq+wIi3w lEs5BD8LAGS6P215L/QrgJEGGVE5DN03XCdJ3qHdnI6NJUA0jDOVfeHunduySc2hLA +3KhEy1YM3na9sukkfN4+kStyJGbv3Pq87mOcm8EnsJV2AJdT9mhDIXC4U6hGkhQxt 06GEUm7UaQziw==
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 01:11:07 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <aeB9e0q2iTqXS9z6@ubby>
References: <3a16c7c4-345e-48ce-af70-a3bf503c8caf@app.fastmail.com> <CACf5n7_0hdeHJXXucva9pb=+pjhcgveHRpjA8XAcXB3LsYUvaw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFpG3gcC+UfO7E=ADGhwr2En5PwipZiq_r6_RdqvmT-5nnh2jw@mail.gmail.com> <d69ba150-0257-4e64-9abb-9229d03a03a6@app.fastmail.com> <PA0P264MB69259DDB3DA252DC57E4B4EBB6222@PA0P264MB6925.FRAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <MN2PR17MB40311654550B8396E7AC238BCD222@MN2PR17MB4031.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> <PA0P264MB6925B21D490AD376437A1AA3B6222@PA0P264MB6925.FRAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <SYCPR01MB366173C5FE49E8734A709062EE232@SYCPR01MB3661.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> <aeB2ndUVkUb5Prxn@ubby> <aeB5CF8hmcy5ltYg@chardros.imrryr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <aeB5CF8hmcy5ltYg@chardros.imrryr.org>
Message-ID-Hash: CVAKB4ESFZC2RIGAO7KSWPDSTIXR3QB3
X-Message-ID-Hash: CVAKB4ESFZC2RIGAO7KSWPDSTIXR3QB3
X-MailFrom: nico@cryptonector.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: Composite ML-DSA
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Q9J-CC23z52SW3ABh76chdoot2o>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 03:52:08PM +1000, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 12:41:49AM -0500, Nico Williams wrote:
> > The composite is atomic.
> 
> Yes, that's how it should be.  This does of course make it difficult to,
> say, have PKCS#11 wrap-up two smart-card readers, one for each key, as a
> single logical composite smart-card, but that's a rather exotic
> hypothetical use-case.  The requirement would now be a single smart-card
> (or more capable hardware device) with a composite key.

Would it be difficult?  Surelygiven two public keys you can construct
the composite public key, and given two signatures you can construct the
composite signature.

Nico
--