IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 process

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 28 March 2014 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFCD1A0767 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SGXhikI76la4 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB941A0716 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hi5so1159163wib.17 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=mRRgCpgkC3GCOEccidDEmzCRlUppQWZw7Cecj38UCCg=; b=IzdGQEAErruBpzL4wDlEYNxzj8YEAuRCD8ZCxi+XKABI/ATZeP+6QstSjwAnzBtIxM dl5eV8O3DOvQXR5rxsCWj2uZni2jcmOHuscGsAKEQyfDaiBbCuAoHusOD0Frx8fskn8c mQHk+GTFI7JdE9dW+uFJOvvQAfusXc1cgJU/zKIzwUo02WMVxsHvle2T0+A289Bv8JO3 KBupw5asCzHKGRDaxJunbW1C/seF+U8yYTrmAC2uEEcwZa1h7rtY4xvVHu9xusKj+7yL rfXLPQ/4hrObN4dLnfSXhJaX7fGqxj0+3W3k0Rs9NZQY+vrByT7y/cki+aOiqYX2FVoZ DUWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmk5KUdHd8/6ncCfI4am2bLNxO/zzAgeZFsx4ZsWBW2En2I2Q97xnpwigxVONSGhhPRP0PD
X-Received: by 10.194.238.231 with SMTP id vn7mr121486wjc.76.1396038560325; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.218.198 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [63.245.221.34]
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0c=WK6HV5G6BpZv98QgJi-Q_WcF-c_Fm5Wkb-w=yyaPAXw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AF370E26-CA97-4CE3-9CC7-2F0939FE2B71@ieca.com> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C711FD4AE833@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <1396017612.19721.110.camel@dhcp-2-127.brq.redhat.com> <CABcZeBPE3=jPYHDULzkUjhFQ4StU+_zpakGj8RaxGy0qAWSaZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0c=WK6HV5G6BpZv98QgJi-Q_WcF-c_Fm5Wkb-w=yyaPAXw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:28:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBN_ELYVLiiyKMEsNq7bGHOP7t_JQv66RnvC4Gc9c5WRxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01493d607b354c04f5b08e9a"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Z01DcIpnKHCYCQ4SLH__UAQo1z0
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 process
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 20:29:25 -0000

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>  >> and
> >> the question is whether to do it:
> >> 1. within the working group (which is stated to have no crypto
> >> expertise).
> >> 2. by using external expertise.
> >
> >
> > I actually don't think think this is the question, since IETF work is
> > done in WGs and we would reach out (and are reaching out) for
> > external expertise in any case.
>
> Kenneth Patterson and Peter Gutmann are in the WG.
>

My bad! I certainly didn't mean to suggest that we didn't have anyone in the
WG with cryptographic expertise. We also have Uri Blumenthal, Hugo Krawczyk
(from time to time), David McGrew, Marsh Ray, Hovav Shacham, and a bunch of
other people I apologize to in advance for not mentioning.

-Ekr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email