Re: [Trans] Draft agenda

Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com> Tue, 25 February 2014 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB5D1A042A for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 02:09:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f3Pwl5rY-nE8 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 02:09:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ian.brad.office.comodo.net (eth5.brad-fw.brad.office.ccanet.co.uk [178.255.87.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDB91A0427 for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 02:09:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 1013 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Feb 2014 10:09:17 -0000
Received: from nigel.brad.office.comodo.net (HELO [192.168.0.58]) (192.168.0.58) (smtp-auth username rob, mechanism plain) by ian.brad.office.comodo.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:09:17 +0000
Message-ID: <530C6BCD.7030801@comodo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:09:17 +0000
From: Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
References: <53063600.4020102@gmail.com> <CALzYgEe0XrQdKDZN3_dwFLnM87+TXyYRMzj4ZGe5xKi-T_5V+g@mail.gmail.com> <530B86F6.5040201@gmail.com> <CABrd9SSpyw4nJ9t7X0WDeN+1MnhD+__-QXLOQXYs=h2JCUrwDg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwj4XniVS_n+M3TmT_LM+P6H6HGgcnhMezUjnupKXzwwdg@mail.gmail.com> <CABrd9STabJA4Fp75HfC7ORR1LQZT+q0DDuB61O0JGBOt31cpmQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABrd9STabJA4Fp75HfC7ORR1LQZT+q0DDuB61O0JGBOt31cpmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/FT4mD2AW_vnSkAeAX82qHveQ21A
Cc: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>, Eran Messeri <eranm@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Draft agenda
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:09:23 -0000

On 25/02/14 07:23, Ben Laurie wrote:
> On 24 February 2014 19:17, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What exactly is a 'precertificate'. Either something is a cert or it is not.
>>
>> If it parses as an X.509v3 certificate then it is an X.509v3 certificate and
>> thats an end to it.
>
> Indeed, and a precertificate is a certificate. RFC 6962 defines what
> exactly it is.
>
> Not sure where you're going with this.
>
>> If it is not then it is probably a CSR which would seem to be the existing
>> PKIX structure that fits its purpose.
>
> Not really - a precertificate needs to be signed.

CSRs are signed.  Self-signed, usually.

I think Phill is suggesting that a Precertificate could be a CSR, 
generated and signed by the CA (rather than self-signed by the 
certificate applicant).  The problem I see with this is that the CSR 
format doesn't contain some of the essential fields that MUST be present 
in a Precertificate: Serial Number, Issuer Name, etc.

-- 
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
COMODO - Creating Trust Online