Re: [Trans] Draft agenda

[Melinda Shore <[e-mail]>]

On 2/24/14 12:12 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> Whether or not these is time at the meeting, I suggest this is a
> discussion we continue on therightkey because I have a feeling that
> Melinda is going to kick us out pretty quick if we get into discussion
> of approaches. I would kick me out.

We have a very short session scheduled in London, and I feel
pretty strongly about IETF meetings as working meetings.

As for relevance, right now therightkey is the best place
for discussion of other approaches to fixing PKI, while trans
is specifically for discussion of certificate transparency.
The only thing that's in our charter at the moment is 6962bis.
That doesn't mean that other applications of CT are out-of-
scope, but that we'd need to recharter to take them on
as work items.  It's a bit early for that.  Probably the
best way to keep these proposals alive is to get internet
drafts posted.  I'd like to stay focused on getting 6962bis
done, but won't stomp on discussion of other CT applications
unless they take over the mailing list.  And otherwise I am
completely agnostic on the question of whether those discussions
happen here or on therightkey.

Melinda