IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench messages (draft-gont-tsvwg-source-quench)

sob@harvard.edu (Scott O. Bradner) Sat, 22 January 2011 12:29 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@harvard.edu>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8769C3A691D for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:29:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.156
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.156 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.443, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Avh1AuCyBbJt for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:29:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (newdev.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4C83A6917 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:29:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id 10AFB7F785F; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:31:56 -0500 (EST)
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench messages (draft-gont-tsvwg-source-quench)
Message-Id: <20110122123156.10AFB7F785F@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:31:56 -0500
From: sob@harvard.edu
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:29:09 -0000

   "Does the WG believe this document effectively addresses
   an existing problem, and should this draft form the basis for
   a solution?"

yes & yes

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email