IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench messages (draft-gont-tsvwg-source-quench)

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org> Thu, 06 January 2011 09:20 UTC

Return-Path: <bidulock@openss7.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD7C3A6C33 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 01:20:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06Qnz71+kiUM for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 01:20:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw.openss7.com (gw.openss7.com [206.75.119.236]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9049D3A6C19 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 01:20:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (ns5.evil.openss7.net [192.168.9.5]) by gw.openss7.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p069KorK017145; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 02:20:50 -0700
Received: from wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p069KnSC014603; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 02:20:49 -0700
Received: (from brian@localhost) by wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p069KmhS014602; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 02:20:48 -0700
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 02:20:48 -0700
From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench messages (draft-gont-tsvwg-source-quench)
Message-ID: <20110106092048.GA14506@openss7.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, "tsvwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org chair" <tsvwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, tsvwg list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <4D21F2FC.2090000@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <FE2AD841-7CAD-4A09-A766-73A1D5BE1F56@cisco.com> <068B22BC-E1B4-4C7F-99C5-3B8B483EB057@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <068B22BC-E1B4-4C7F-99C5-3B8B483EB057@cisco.com>
Organization: http://www.openss7.org/
Dsn-Notification-To: <bidulock@openss7.org>
X-Spam-To: <blockme@openss7.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, "tsvwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org chair" <tsvwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, tsvwg list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bidulock@openss7.org
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:20:25 -0000

Fred,

Fred Baker wrote:                      (Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:35:09)
>
> I think my view is clear. There is no operational problem. The
> working group can decide what it wants to do.
> 

Well, I agree with you, Fred.  It is even more wasteful of the WG's
time arguing whether it is wasteful of the WG's time.

--brian

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
bidulock@openss7.org
http://www.openss7.org/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email