IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench messages (draft-gont-tsvwg-source-quench)

"DeSimone, Antonio" <Antonio.DeSimone@jhuapl.edu> Thu, 06 January 2011 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <antonio.desimone@jhuapl.edu>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583953A6F1D for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 06:38:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YeB4YbIX2Y0N for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 06:38:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jhuapl.edu (piper.jhuapl.edu [128.244.251.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91643A6F16 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 06:38:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([128.244.198.91]) by piper.jhuapl.edu with ESMTP with TLS id 5Y8HCH1.99128113; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:40:36 -0500
Received: from aplesstripe.dom1.jhuapl.edu ([128.244.198.211]) by aplexcas2.dom1.jhuapl.edu ([128.244.198.91]) with mapi; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:40:36 -0500
From: "DeSimone, Antonio" <Antonio.DeSimone@jhuapl.edu>
To: "bidulock@openss7.org" <bidulock@openss7.org>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:40:28 -0500
Subject: Re: Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench messages (draft-gont-tsvwg-source-quench)
Thread-Topic: Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench messages (draft-gont-tsvwg-source-quench)
Thread-Index: Acutg0OmvIk1vQhtThuhiYEm4tX6fgALGWQu
Message-ID: <C94B3E8C.7A97%Antonio.DeSimone@jhuapl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20110106092048.GA14506@openss7.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3377151628_5501743"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, "tsvwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org chair" <tsvwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, tsvwg list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:38:48 -0000

On 1/6/11 4:20 AM, "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org> wrote:

> Fred,
> 
> Fred Baker wrote:                      (Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:35:09)
>> 
>> I think my view is clear. There is no operational problem. The
>> working group can decide what it wants to do.
>> 

I agree with Fred on this.  There is no operational problem, but there is
are minor spec problems.  At best that is bad form, but there are some
people who care about the specs.

The doc closes the identified spec problems, in particular by updating 792
and 1122, which contain statements inconsistent with running code and
now-accepted good practices.  I support this draft as a tsvwg work item.

> Well, I agree with you, Fred.  It is even more wasteful of the WG's
> time arguing whether it is wasteful of the WG's time

agree
 
> --brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email