IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench messages (draft-gont-tsvwg-source-quench)

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Thu, 06 January 2011 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA893A6F3D for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:32:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.518
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.518 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.081, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wlBRHfds9Eht for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:32:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f66.google.com (mail-yw0-f66.google.com [209.85.213.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA9E3A6F39 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:32:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ywi6 with SMTP id 6so3778460ywi.1 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:34:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=C6W4gvRrq/9028ySoQR0VX4rxMYTbeXQo6NG/Hve8lI=; b=qstrW+7ajJA24EG9KD/nWfz8Auk1JPd3J2Lx9ZRXbARw15DqYn62ZRURMrVLXne/YH W+fLU8Ln0lXaQWKf8fxyOfl/QeVy4yFVYdbiAuuZqTr9MHY57Nyh5yktvYOYuqrlu37c eA/aegWrFGcD6uuiku+9ZJEcnsW8yOEgfQ39A=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=JqducfO/wmVfSOZqqed/dWgv7ZGzscKb92+j23RlS/8qLFWRcmds7KhBXJQv+rvvzv 8tCSdo9FyCwbN69sWi3U5i42oOTMol+Gm2Ciqjl/zTYrdRfat3dxzNDougTrxun1BMxO NX47aqccfS5lHERSyKXXxBcTJn+XzzJP8vLoc=
Received: by 10.90.61.19 with SMTP id j19mr2303605aga.161.1294338884223; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:34:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.11] (155-136-17-190.fibertel.com.ar [190.17.136.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d15sm32501713ana.35.2011.01.06.10.34.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:34:43 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Fernando Gont <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D260B3A.1050804@gont.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:34:34 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Subject: Re: Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench messages (draft-gont-tsvwg-source-quench)
References: <4D21F2FC.2090000@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <FE2AD841-7CAD-4A09-A766-73A1D5BE1F56@cisco.com> <068B22BC-E1B4-4C7F-99C5-3B8B483EB057@cisco.com> <20110106092048.GA14506@openss7.org> <4D2602D5.30608@isi.edu> <4D260555.8050901@gont.com.ar> <4D26071C.30303@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4D26071C.30303@isi.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, "tsvwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org chair" <tsvwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, tsvwg list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 18:32:39 -0000

On 06/01/2011 03:17 p.m., Joe Touch wrote:

> Yes. Does that mean we need to create a separate doc to do it? No.

You proposed exactly this a number of times, on the tcpm list. -- Should
I dig the archive?


> We can put it on queue for 1122-bis or 1812-bis, and *whenever* that
> happens should be sufficient for this particular issue.

Please be realistic.

I'm not going to continue wasting energy discussing about wasting
energy. Nor am I going to get into yet another endless discussion on why
you oppose to virtually every document you have not authored.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email