Re: A workable alternative to "hex-encoded UTF-8 encoded URLs"

"Martin J. Duerst" <> Sat, 19 April 1997 16:50 UTC

Received: from cnri by id aa12613; 19 Apr 97 12:50 EDT
Received: from services.Bunyip.Com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08181; 19 Apr 97 12:50 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA23538 for uri-out; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 12:40:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from (mocha.Bunyip.Com []) by (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA23533 for <>; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 12:40:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from by with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA14059 (mail destined for; Sat, 19 Apr 97 12:40:11 -0400
Received: from by with SMTP (PP) id <>; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 18:40:13 +0200
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 18:40:04 +0200
From: "Martin J. Duerst" <>
To: Larry Masinter <>
Subject: Re: A workable alternative to "hex-encoded UTF-8 encoded URLs"
In-Reply-To: <>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970419183251.708c-100000@enoshima>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 16 Apr 1997, Larry Masinter wrote:

> If the problem of "users need to be able to see and write
> URLs in their preferred script" is important, there's
> a way to solve that problem actually:

[description of how to use a directory service]

> I call these "FRLs": Friendly Resource Locators. They're not
> Uniform, but they can be used to locate resources.

We already have search services, not only in the US.

The fact that directory services are not very quickly
developping is an indication to me that (at least for
English), between URLs and search services, there may
not be that much of a need for something else.

And I don't know why the rest of the world has to wait
for something else when English speakers already have
it all.

> It will require the development of a global infrastructure
> for a directory service, but that is actually easier to
> imagine than the global deployment of user agents that could
> handle hex-encoded UTF-8 encoded URLs.

Well, as long as the average user agent runs on a PC with
Windows or some other box with Java, I strongly doubt that
your global directory service infrastructure will be
deployed earlier.

Regards,	Martin.