IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] getting back to UTA and injecting clue

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 23 April 2014 01:29 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB271A02D6 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.174
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.174 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r3vmJvu_mdIJ for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37221A02D4 for <uta@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (unknown [24.8.184.175]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 174D44032A; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:29:15 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <5357176A.8010103@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:29:14 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: uta@ietf.org
References: <53249D4E.2080104@network-heretics.com> <5324ECFC.2050004@akr.io> <53256D07.7020005@network-heretics.com> <5325AEB2.9070804@mnt.se> <5325B3E7.3060508@network-heretics.com> <5326271D.40107@eff.org> <532660F5.908@cs.tcd.ie> <7258.1395059446@sandelman.ca> <5326FCF4.2070808@cisco.com> <5332FFD3.1050900@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <5332FFD3.1050900@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/YPhsk6e7fW9h7lWxDXUdU6vyA4Y
Subject: Re: [Uta] getting back to UTA and injecting clue
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:29:22 -0000

Any thoughts on this path forward?

On 3/26/14, 10:26 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 3/17/14, 7:47 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>> I'd like suggest a change of direction for this discussion.
>
> I would, too. :-)
>
> My recollection from conversations in Vancouver is that we were seeking
> a quick win of documenting best practices for the existing use of TLS
> and PKI - TLS versions, cipher suites, etc. With all the conversations
> over terminology, unauthenticated encryption, DANE as a new mode in
> addition to PKI, etc., I wonder if we could at least push forward
> quickly with the TLS-PKI recommendations and, in parallel, work out the
> thornier issues.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email