Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-requirements-00.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 19 November 2012 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB4D21F859D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 02:03:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.923
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.923 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZuLkKciU4Cf1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 02:03:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com (mail-oa0-f44.google.com [209.85.219.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F4321F8551 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 02:03:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n5so5009652oag.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 02:03:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=SvExfWJQ2XFJlwdbUvwkSz5/5kPsX5EdtN3kE9gYF+o=; b=fu7TrXC6efvoQg+tbaPCFEWdrQcQjTnlFhP+u4nt2y96ua0+gmTvIQrIym347F/4CT PKmO6rWprL08bND4rvyTbncWYdSfA0HJpmA9AUuwSOlPtv2yNKtUKddrByjsqrgwbpP6 BYL9zqC3XSCRAxXrrovpXVJnmdcvW/lAosH0kbzb8K58MeMM1pLf64VHf9h/Nj6/D9E4 F4Hbk/XnUCTWCvevDUDXNu3YQIohLihpSCkJIjGx2J+uIP6HaoRNWZxQiEFSXbwbp4pf Dgvs0o13wnBj4Mquid+xmNcFsP7Kn6adVv4iZPrVjPsYku+LX6D3RzNUj8pPuU5DdUJO tM0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=SvExfWJQ2XFJlwdbUvwkSz5/5kPsX5EdtN3kE9gYF+o=; b=FgCrZSZNzNjPao0EGmNP1PibuixvQKP6jYXaLNjs4NColZGcayBWYzNJMlt+6dN158 8IrVmIEfpMvSugw72GbwI/lTiaRr7IXmyYlVdLmib5Bx1xEL2OruMr9JVHcIOfgLJbfP nAORYZIkvJZRpX4ZjaSe14cSthfHDkKAQZeja3QR4nlc4PAnsrHyh6K3qv/F67FLAl76 pmph2kTZHM/oiF5M5A0m4PwC3JbjEJfD/49taeirGzvOm/uhfXMvMKttRogcqZwMFUgL HTCbje/z/j9EUfamthlPkNKUuCcedIj4ZeuArA9qIFXLQv9IACpVql5ZzgJWu7feqqjf 5lsQ==
Received: by 10.60.9.166 with SMTP id a6mr723584oeb.89.1353319418408; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 02:03:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.111.99 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 02:03:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <17547_1353319026_50AA0272_17547_9460_1_1B2E7539FECD9048B261B791B1B24A7C3EF5B56F7B@PUEXCB1A.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E947B1328@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr0PcobuWwu+Dp36NHaFRyinD1SRV0WPk792h9EwwsuFmQ@mail.gmail.com> <17547_1353319026_50AA0272_17547_9460_1_1B2E7539FECD9048B261B791B1B24A7C3EF5B56F7B@PUEXCB1A.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:03:18 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr205BrFYDRz5DqYaGJvFVhTm-YNWQPbuSD0t3rKN=wj+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: david.binet@orange.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1edfc33adfd04ced63be0
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQldRx35yLaHcJTRUqCPjEmWaiTzXtWAAS/YBDJU2ZZTm5xBbzTeol466Aw86ZeBTvgTpS3KzRlAWFHoSVRBt9TfreyiiQgiT79JXJ00R3vfGLd+6RLjxnpmm8tMBqSaVbjDvYGtGPkhzqBAyZMyNoi8YOtbxMYX+PJOBEta26U4Kro3VQ2W/QoC7Kr2+EdujLNMlSjT
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-requirements-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:03:40 -0000

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:57 PM, <david.binet@orange.com> wrote:

> **
>
> And I do not understand the comment about the need to remove some
> requirements and to provide a link to RFC3316bis document. I do not
> understand why a RFCbis draft was proposed if the specifications were
> already present in draft-binet-* document.
>
> Because that draft properly updates RFC3316. This document does not update
RFC3316, it's something completely different.

>  Second, most of this document attempts to standardize feature sets, not
> protocols or interoperability. I'm not sure this is is in scope for the
> IETF, and even more so for an operations group inside the IETF.
> [[david]] It is your opinion but as operator, it is something which is
> very important and there is a lack in standardisation documents where some
> IPv6 profile is defined. We receive a lot of support about
> such specifications.
>
> Does the IETF define an IPv4 profile? If not, why not?