Re: [v6ops] draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis - where to go from here

james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Wed, 02 March 2011 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@apple.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841FE3A6824 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 07:56:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sglgBVcH-uIs for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 07:56:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38E53A6816 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 07:56:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay13.apple.com (relay13.apple.com [17.128.113.29]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01036D5DB14B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 07:57:23 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7b1cae000002701-2f-4d6e68e26114
Received: from gertie.apple.com (gertie.apple.com [17.151.62.15]) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 21.01.09985.2E86E6D4; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 07:57:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Received: from [172.16.1.20] ([75.101.54.88]) by gertie.apple.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LHF00JGETNM1600@gertie.apple.com> for v6ops@ietf.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 07:57:22 -0800 (PST)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <16BC7386-769C-46E3-A6E4-6EA957268E06@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 07:57:22 -0800
Message-id: <0B0B1D69-37A1-4BDC-A473-D574C087F3A0@apple.com>
References: <8C80472E-DEF2-45DE-BECB-D09E58328D14@cisco.com> <20110301221558.GA22199@srv03.cluenet.de> <B2B0EB4F-BF8B-4148-A0BE-E64937AFD54B@apple.com> <027501cbd86b$ed15f2d0$c741d870$%sturek@att.net> <EE6C68F4-5A67-4511-8904-BF0B31ACD683@apple.com> <16BC7386-769C-46E3-A6E4-6EA957268E06@cisco.com>
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis - where to go from here
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:56:27 -0000

On Mar 1, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
> On Mar 1, 2011, at 4:45 PM, james woodyatt wrote:
> 
>> Understood.  Do any of those organizations have a recommendation for a suitable interior routing protocol for residential IPv6 networks?  I'm pretty sure IETF doesn't have one to recommend right now, and I'm pessimistic that it will have one by next year to satisfy the plans of the Smart Energy community.
> 
> Well, one could discuss ZOSPF, or OSPFv3 with a default configuration, or RIPng, or IS-IS with a default configuration. Why would, picking one at random, RIPng be inappropriate?

Unacceptable human interface burden, for starters.  Beyond that, I have no technical contributions I can make here.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, core os networking