Re: [v6ops] draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis - where to go from here

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 02 March 2011 03:41 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264383A6B5D for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 19:41:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.130, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CvOK4Cuag13s for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 19:41:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D00D3A6A21 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 19:41:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=565; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1299037330; x=1300246930; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=uYQ6RguMT6xiWZL52uw63swYfg0arhyCQFN0r4tt7mg=; b=UMJIdN+5pi5MPEZqSrr01QAT3d8zXPpXsMGRGp69Be91Nk6ojtCviby6 NNe01rTapicbSP5mwbgw8XRykYveQKXhJw0wRXlkR+H6mXKE9v8frTDVR t96JaORdHTAF1MzTHJQZVZy3T+yTBfaKncnLfaHKz2LSssBcAIto8RyYh k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEABpLbU2rR7Hu/2dsb2JhbACmVXSiF5t0hWEEhRKHDQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,251,1297036800"; d="scan'208";a="272535348"
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com ([171.71.177.238]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2011 03:42:08 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-219.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-219.cisco.com [10.32.244.219]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p223g84d019534; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 03:42:08 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <EE6C68F4-5A67-4511-8904-BF0B31ACD683@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:42:08 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <16BC7386-769C-46E3-A6E4-6EA957268E06@cisco.com>
References: <8C80472E-DEF2-45DE-BECB-D09E58328D14@cisco.com> <20110301221558.GA22199@srv03.cluenet.de> <B2B0EB4F-BF8B-4148-A0BE-E64937AFD54B@apple.com> <027501cbd86b$ed15f2d0$c741d870$%sturek@att.net> <EE6C68F4-5A67-4511-8904-BF0B31ACD683@apple.com>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis - where to go from here
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 03:41:06 -0000

On Mar 1, 2011, at 4:45 PM, james woodyatt wrote:

> Understood.  Do any of those organizations have a recommendation for a suitable interior routing protocol for residential IPv6 networks?  I'm pretty sure IETF doesn't have one to recommend right now, and I'm pessimistic that it will have one by next year to satisfy the plans of the Smart Energy community.

Well, one could discuss ZOSPF, or OSPFv3 with a default configuration, or RIPng, or IS-IS with a default configuration. Why would, picking one at random, RIPng be inappropriate?