Re: [v6ops] draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis - where to go from here

["Lee Howard" <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
Jack Bates
>
> You've also broken a good portion of my customers if they left
> everything plugged in as is and could upgrade their routers to IPv6 (or
> I'll be issuing 2-8 /48's for a single customer, as it's not uncommon
> for multiple routers to be connected into the ISP bridging modem, or
> even a switch connected to the modem with a string of routers connected
> to it)

That's not uncommon?  To me, that's unheard of in a " residential or
   small office router."

If the problem statement is, "We need to define behavior for a device 
that supports an arbitrary number of instances in an arbitrary topology 
with an arbitrary number of connections without requiring management
or configuration, and for less than $50USD," then we have scoped 
ourselves beyond the possible.

Issue multiple prefixes per customer, if you support multiple routers.  If
you don't like the prefix length, change it.  

Lee