IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis - where to go from here

james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Tue, 01 March 2011 22:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@apple.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C1B3A6A30 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:34:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t232emxVeD7d for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:34:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E973A6A46 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:34:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay13.apple.com (relay13.apple.com [17.128.113.29]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61271D5A41D9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:35:41 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7b1cae000002701-c5-4d6d74bddf99
Received: from gertie.apple.com (gertie.apple.com [17.151.62.15]) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id EC.D1.09985.DB47D6D4; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:35:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Received: from [17.193.13.64] by gertie.apple.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LHE0013MHFGXX60@gertie.apple.com> for v6ops@ietf.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:35:41 -0800 (PST)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <20110301221558.GA22199@srv03.cluenet.de>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:35:40 -0800
Message-id: <B2B0EB4F-BF8B-4148-A0BE-E64937AFD54B@apple.com>
References: <8C80472E-DEF2-45DE-BECB-D09E58328D14@cisco.com> <20110301221558.GA22199@srv03.cluenet.de>
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1203)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis - where to go from here
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:34:38 -0000

On Mar 1, 2011, at 2:15 PM, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 06:54:01AM +0000, Fred Baker wrote:
>> What do people want to see happen in draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis?
> 
> Speaking with an operator point of view: get the areas it covers
> polished up as quickly as possible and get it out of the door as RFC so
> we can start pointing vendors to it. [...]

It's not currently on the agenda for IETF 80.  Do the authors plan to ask the working group to adopt it?  I hope they update it to remove sections 5.4, 5.5 and 5.9 before they do that.  (Amend the figure in section 4, too.)  Otherwise, I predict, the draft will be more contentious than operators probably want it to be.  If you want it published quickly, then get rid of all the talk about routed subscriber networks and prefix delegation on the LAN.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, core os networking

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email