IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis - where to go from here

Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de> Tue, 01 March 2011 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <dr@cluenet.de>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0A63A6AC6 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:14:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.43
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.43 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.170, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ZN11jG7yjRC for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:14:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.cluenet.de (mail1.cluenet.de [IPv6:2001:1440:201:101::5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A57D3A6B05 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:14:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail1.cluenet.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id CC62B1080B7; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 23:15:58 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 23:15:58 +0100
From: Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20110301221558.GA22199@srv03.cluenet.de>
Mail-Followup-To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <8C80472E-DEF2-45DE-BECB-D09E58328D14@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8C80472E-DEF2-45DE-BECB-D09E58328D14@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis - where to go from here
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:14:56 -0000

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 06:54:01AM +0000, Fred Baker wrote:
> What do people want to see happen in draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis?

Speaking with an operator point of view: get the areas it covers
polished up as quickly as possible and get it out of the door as RFC so
we can start pointing vendors to it. There's always the option to update
the RFC later with more topics covered and operational experience
feedback incorporated.

> Part of the outcome of IETF 79 was a discussion around Tom Herbst's
> draft regarding interactions with the Smart Grid's Home Area Network.
> This is something that is not mandatory in a next generation
> residential router, but I suspect will have utility.

See above. If not really required now, I'd favor not to consider it for
cpe-router-bis in order to avoid further delays.

Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email