Re: [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd-01.txt

[Jen Linkova <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 7:47 AM Ole Troan <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> And DHCP PD can of course also assign a /128 prefix to the host if that’s desired. :-)

That's very much UNDESIRED, thank you ;)

In a nutshell, SLAAC is good for hosts, while DHCP is convenient for operators.
So let's hide SLAAC from the operator while still having it available
for the host.
Hence /64.

>
> > On 15 Dec 2022, at 15:45, Gert Doering <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 02:59:33PM +1100, Jen Linkova wrote:
> >> We've just submitted -01 version of draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd, which
> >> proposes using DHCPv6-PD to delete /64 per host (the draft was very
> >> briefly presented at the last IETF).
> >
> > I do not think that a /64 per host is reasonable address usage.
> >
> > To implement this, network admins need not only to add v6 subnets
> > to broadcast segments but also add pools of sizeable size, which does
> > create pressure in the /48.../64 range of the addresses they have
> > ("one /48 per site").
> >
> > Something like a /96 per host - so "limitless amounts of host would
> > fit into a single /64" would avoid that, and still fulfill the
> > stated necessity of having many many many addresses per hosts.
> >
> > Gert Doering
> >        -- NetMaster
> > --
> > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
> >
> > SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
> > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> > D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> > Tel: [phone]         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > v6ops mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops



-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry