IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd-01.txt

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 19 December 2022 04:18 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C76C14F606; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 20:18:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S_oaBMNqRzVf; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 20:18:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 095FBC14F741; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 20:18:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id hd14-20020a17090b458e00b0021909875bccso12927925pjb.1; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 20:18:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=h2o4nFk/GfsmR+dckZoLPcv+PMUoy5LPm8nVh0ANg50=; b=Z7jv8IMIa6QSCKf5leevvv8foEuhu0T5zdLLOEFW8aCn5zx0Rw+WVoLtXy3V0SXpxi Ss4dyPobYIfiVGAU1HPVA/r6W0WA8+aMBj6p8a35Xmu8kcCp4blvQDEMnCkHQRfLqr43 IugMk+l475arT8lpMWfDNBMebhnKFP8SsmGa3yW7rGChiU/WZn/d+Npp5vsNkLf0tFtD gl/lo8cehVUkLn+DrmQAMZRn76h9P6FagjRxqMhVxmaxtv8gSQW8plA4u8hTzD8mdajq bHb3soojGdUjP3T9AgDcYwenNgwinZAsVuzLDt9K/boQurDL4uRsNwixD2OksQa47fYp s3hA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=h2o4nFk/GfsmR+dckZoLPcv+PMUoy5LPm8nVh0ANg50=; b=lM3OmSY6qcMilnQmforTaLsgoXZmJWfeJ7s/romZWdQ8w7rRuwIikCl0sGbfXPyArV TqicVUqIdeXWp2cLOdBO+gD+YDVCrcCy7m528d1ENEWXGei5daS9qi4b+rMgHzHNgEfu GXhU+zzWFvpE6xZIPxd9hViCZiPimNyFhm4QHnQHXFWF7CUCo4DwDRt3sQxiuZfBKHwM hS+mt2Z/d+JhoLeIfFaF7Vskpji06MDsc9BBjNiCJJKwKDmI6bhFMV+1FwCzlVXGfEkb ETNpCr4ip3/xElAQTJnHlB8fJFlYoNOCzZFSbuXLGpoZTTcL+A7PagW/WDe63W1/NmnE AGcA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pk9RNHCYq0hjHCO/ifg94ZirBu/4Wz1UV44ftnkK3GAS6PPnmyr TrXr5KdXaurYl2n/cN3i8ec=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5LxfE42LqYsEnrCk4SuUYXnc7oAxrLbscjcXmOhERa28UhPeWCiAp5arA2sJU1aS8zPMxTYQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:93a1:b0:af:7a4c:fb7d with SMTP id x33-20020a056a2093a100b000af7a4cfb7dmr25400520pzh.23.1671423518282; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 20:18:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2601:648:8200:cc10:6858:223a:d488:46a7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p21-20020a63f455000000b004767bc37e03sm5219165pgk.39.2022.12.18.20.18.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Dec 2022 20:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a2b83708c99344b2afb5e65c899b2f76@huawei.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 20:18:35 -0800
Cc: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd@ietf.org" <draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd@ietf.org>, "xiaom@google.com" <xiaom@google.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <63C4488F-AF94-41EB-A892-EFAB788CF0A3@gmail.com>
References: <167107554671.48477.568330207202509840@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFU7BATp=gEB3S8AzhCYDMN3fzLQrYY9pzcWJ=LQnrjC9bRKEA@mail.gmail.com> <a2b83708c99344b2afb5e65c899b2f76@huawei.com>
To: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/9yWs_jqaOCtkUwqv1D1xvFP50Vg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd-01.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 04:18:40 -0000


> On Dec 15, 2022, at 6:23 AM, Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> 1.	What is the point to keep SLAAC if DHCP infrastructure is mandatory? 

What I might suggest is to make SLAAC normal (as s the current case, e.g., retaining backward compatibility) and provide a way to tell hosts that they should request a prefix via DHCP-PD.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email