IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-ipversion6-loopback-prefix-00.txt

Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Tue, 17 February 2015 00:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581AD1A892B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:50:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNtisikUlr2x for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:50:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22b.google.com (mail-qc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ECDA1A892A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:50:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id l6so26740225qcy.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:50:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=o/iKhNlsUB27Yy3t0m5MxCQq9PNdbfBZXPR3BK+jkT8=; b=Gj3C/8c0ocwhIs8FaoboNGHRkWMHsrUbyTRwPiH33p/aLDHQk1MXQEoMbDzAO2R1mY hprT7SWtpkgKI46EWrsRjiGOvnQrDQRGdZNxHCvIE1wfDM6Bgl5HA/dIMsO8UkB0MMwz sDK2fntgw15KfbibeVX5l63nhT3p6eD7LNrcdLEOeibX7GC0TumY5camke4mwX8DZq1l pCwsG8dKqZvVGGoBVIdlO7c5EuukLeiPVl9jpjrvlRofs1vBhhlltMfPF+CV8Vyg9v9c OYQqJNvCqNLe8VaKKB4dsRPH1vBuLwnltXdSDYnN/nbdJobN3cjKTfJb+kKevaKySWF9 qRPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=o/iKhNlsUB27Yy3t0m5MxCQq9PNdbfBZXPR3BK+jkT8=; b=j1V/LiV7dD+0jz59clAwBBQkvx0CnPRUs0NXKNHs/LVJNBxR+NfrhspDJqMlS1TaWx UYakMvJfWsgsFQH2zO+wYC6j2myLLRINmpLo+N26uHg3QjUz4xNr9zSoKt1b0JhZ7bpM f+20MvMwCkQP68k+dnATA5MVsqbnsqsXRXfrnQYyF3DA0R3eJEYZBJbUMnn7fP5k0u8b DrhFV49SKFQdSQZJJOsqh0/gYjElObOogJ6aK/YcM8FYBpvQSNzLvZjGcdnJbfpsckgR XVXK8N2X3gG8n33WAOkcuqK/RayfycJeLXso8FeLk9IVrLjj4Zn4Sndutap+V1mpWsNW +QNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlcIcybuBcCwCoeoDlXX3kpopSyCILl24449Q131al+uhgGlskkDgFlWpfxMNKiqz4VOA3N
X-Received: by 10.140.164.8 with SMTP id k8mr251666qhk.23.1424134201228; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:50:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.224.2 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:49:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <806685785.8046861.1424132596458.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <DED2296C-010C-4B75-94DC-028C0FA19E6F@virtualized.org> <806685785.8046861.1424132596458.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:49:40 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAedzxo3hP2FqDvdW9MNVTBKtpdbONa0ZDjURvk5oihr=-bWUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/BEcMesO6IpqD0P8kIKUE72gn3YA>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-ipversion6-loopback-prefix-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 00:50:03 -0000

I was wondering about maybe an update/doc that merged this use case?

I was in favor of your loopback prefix, as I recall (it would be
especially handy if any application should implicitly bind to
1::${RAND96} /without/ any special permissions), but I can't recall
the opposition at the time.

/me re-reads/

Ah, yeah it turns out the use cases I wanted it for are exactly the
ones that were opposed by others at the time (the implicit delivery of
all packets to destinations in this prefix is /technically/ new
behaviour).  Sad panda.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email