Re: [v6ops] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ipversion6-loopback-prefix-00.txt

Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Mon, 16 February 2015 09:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B431A8793 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 01:39:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id npG2xXru3-Eo for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 01:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-x236.google.com (mail-qc0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58EE41A1A98 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 01:39:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id r5so9705317qcx.13 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 01:39:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wOMb/e0wE538dm7CMzVmBERv7f4MDzq3hUb1DbOtLnU=; b=ERNFiXIcudtfYKB+7UaTZ+TWccvp07En8KZ5NnVr9fkjF8xCiEbUL9UgZKgr3jARW+ WWKneCXmw82jDx+YRSxmoAvm2YLVRbq+9US+stKg2PY5sUd9cgp1XHBOXqhtN+lJtfMc 6fG973dMW8oF10pNrDm9n5Y+P9EpnaMESagGYedryCZ33rvSQppwG48VMlj9wXl8X5Et 7JJ0Y22j4OhpJCnooRiDGs5LdnuD9DbElUd+vNj6mQoQY5wwpc7FizmlsU1kkwc0OrlG pz6K3j4Yj3o8xAYiEg6ZI0r9g/HOoFMuHjZ3XADsnB5XF7t5KgFqm0ziH4FyyLQr33VK Hihw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wOMb/e0wE538dm7CMzVmBERv7f4MDzq3hUb1DbOtLnU=; b=DPk5lqdBJuJOzdxjeON3lsr0IF96UTIy0yqC1sh/FSg6YS0BmRNnTWAyaVNVYHHtCr UUhWHov22WfTFBS0Nybk9pzgmtzBnYWlWn6Gm/fqkNoOE72GYriTuWe2XbnVEOcnW/7E 0V5O4jg8rS5hwe5iI+6ySRs1It4jckHUhRp/HHheg4HuoQa84tPTYOE+O6HkBUk2gQHF W3d2wg3TJ4D1T+vKBJ6+m5y/KfM8KGyComlblLXAEFrYwbg8lfJbVTADXLlN9DVRVmVb HDZYlEiN5vve8DL3kMiOLL2/2c/9rniga6B1Ho9O+V98XnSHGuLTQic3j5Ud7885l1VM FL4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkhFwArNZsFCJ/jVO87peK2qLkq5aNze3fTjALNFxQ5uPVImTb1KniCiEkxXggsGlacsFU8
X-Received: by 10.229.216.71 with SMTP id hh7mr824200qcb.0.1424079560388; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 01:39:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.224.2 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 01:39:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <602226231.6806482.1424078950598.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <CAAedzxq9cy2NjR98RQ=Z2uWGM=DuCKcBmnOV2r1iDhd1G5F0Kw@mail.gmail.com> <602226231.6806482.1424078950598.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:39:00 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAedzxo1Vm9LEy5UXX7DuWxCXjyAKJNzbuMvW5GA2jhwLYEYdQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/UPczg5V0gOeE_mkqfzDgsEqWecw>
Cc: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ipversion6-loopback-prefix-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:39:23 -0000

> If ICANN want to do the above for IPv6, they should instead reserve a new IPv6 prefix, similar to how RFC6666 defines a special purpose discard prefix. There is plenty of IPv6 space to do so, rather than creating a single address exception out of a block of addresses that has or would have a well known expected purpose and behaviour.

Ah, then perhaps they could even just use 0100::53:53 (or 0100::35:35).