IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ipversion6-loopback-prefix-00.txt

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Tue, 17 February 2015 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359CE1A8857 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 04:48:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tRdpROwlspKa for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 04:48:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C93FE1A8854 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 04:48:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2472; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1424177331; x=1425386931; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=3gL5S2hA0irWNYKk0su5LmdXx17rP35dR+u0ne8CJXE=; b=Rs5jA/SpAmEQm7FDsD8Gotjyx9MV+NN2HcT7cvLba95LB99Mh/gaTyqv jmE/SlNT5RLm5JSzCwuUJkTm3g//qrwKq0BYBGmr0rQoQz7NLwGJyLsEB 300kmHeX1g2FiyjhP+fkwhDJu4nIhoJXKKIW+GDkASTCnV1aLwjSL2zeC 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B1BQBJOONU/4gNJK1bgkNDgSwEgn/FOQIcdkMBAQEBAQF8hAwBAQEEI1QCEAIBCAQBDwEqAwICAjAUCAkCBAENBYgvt3GXbgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLD4RdEQeCaIFCAQSPOIk3kw0igjKBPG+BRH8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,594,1418083200"; d="scan'208,217";a="124324267"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2015 12:48:50 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1HCmo90028542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:48:50 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.138]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 06:48:49 -0600
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Falcon Darkstar Momot <falcon@iridiumlinux.org>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ipversion6-loopback-prefix-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHQSUIEjnmiENkrAUKRqDIUqGF8vpzzNgiAgAAK6wCAACcnAIAAb4sAgAB3uICAADH9AIAAAkeAgAABEICAAADBgIAAANmAgAC8rgA=
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:48:49 +0000
Message-ID: <D108F705.3D345%evyncke@cisco.com>
References: <D1076758.8F7D%edward.lewis@icann.org> <419285087.7936915.1424128613951.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <54E2A454.3080908@iridiumlinux.org> <CAKD1Yr0oR78UWubp4ZfWQgua5SEw1cFiKJbidDbCqxKWquKGew@mail.gmail.com> <54E2A721.7010106@iridiumlinux.org> <CAKD1Yr0JZ735RWO=yvrQ9PRHkfnX4juMgugQ1XODgU7+K9Cm4g@mail.gmail.com> <54E2A879.2010201@iridiumlinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <54E2A879.2010201@iridiumlinux.org>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.6.141106
x-originating-ip: [10.55.185.73]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D108F7053D345evynckeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/MuQ7CiTNh_j2_XMj7aZMP90W8A8>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ipversion6-loopback-prefix-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:48:55 -0000

From: Falcon Darkstar Momot <falcon@iridiumlinux.org<mailto:falcon@iridiumlinux.org>>
Date: mardi 17 février 2015 03:33

How about discard, 0100::/64 as per RFC6666?  This seems rather more explicit than using loopback as discard.

EV> then what about nodes having routes for 100::/64 to /dev/null? Such as peering routers? :-)

-éric

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email