IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-reqs-rfc3316update

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Fri, 21 September 2012 08:14 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BA721F87B5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.752
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.752 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.003, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A6NBphQ0mRVq for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A62221F86F0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so3356608obb.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; bh=3mxFSlIBvcCTU7LmsvfV1wR/kks9Vgw1LfrasMeIpjA=; b=QHTetnr9qZHpebgtloYraUIS/jLLE8fsw3v28iLx8u/05YH3PhP6fIxejHSmm/pS/Z qgqrFm6rSXvRG6ePuCpswJZmPLFOq8KcIh/D+iBcmLYC2uNWc50n28mLCKpqnAY21T5h Zvb5j9wuK1loyqaZ3pCrF9TZAwhuLCVUjqvwZa1W2+w5xYm6DskKhq8U3Zysess9saY+ t1pKOisB8pcxozIjLee0JSUSPooj2dTqhM6h1QsrTvp5efEM906apC29IZ5r41gQ/JAp 8F6sC+GhnYpiu0tYLG8XKcMyzgAGG6IPEKkZerISdGa8K6aRK605wAvTfhgER7zeMzRK /jBg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=3mxFSlIBvcCTU7LmsvfV1wR/kks9Vgw1LfrasMeIpjA=; b=kEfkngevMHsyosgLsWuJ5T+F7IexF2Yioy2+DoTy4fXav3061joEQyCqQcmns8lDOo wQ4ZyXytMcslz5Q572msTXDF0HRzzhgvbQokNeC5b7RwR4L6A1/G7B1TC0/gKTRkX7qi mhoHntEKAFteVYuI11PwBblN3gPmfdnLgH7zghG/XyGnS8NWXyTC70JIQ4SgrTjvGbTc G8+hfMNJU9lwF8ocVV8S3KU7hAqDjuB9BHBPGWVi+SGeB4eDUlXj2TUw/eUrHi9yXa4n 6e3D/nbPlpP27pJ79+xLFpKn7ytw3aIPsRRyPldO9HdjpLnOdHT4Vx0jz6yohgztPulu egEg==
Received: by 10.182.52.42 with SMTP id q10mr3289814obo.46.1348215283837; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.52.42 with SMTP id q10mr3289808obo.46.1348215283717; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.225.98 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5B123404@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5A40D46C@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr1xnF_mQwy-6OAyXRxkcpoNB099tVC+J89ni6wVA+bmSw@mail.gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5B1233CA@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr0AduMnirD60gB3PYnqWkOu122S1A=hxjyt2FjxqurdnQ@mail.gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5B123404@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:14:23 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1Dv45AMxYcu5YTPB6N9E313KTCfsLazbP6nJkw9Q0-TA@mail.gmail.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae93990711114af04ca31d51a"
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlA9t+4CdLuAgncmljb4EcXjFfGccFRA8g6DNCH/4CeC/tBC6roKN7xPdxp9FTmKf/LX1oaTFdzt90C8MFu7EyoORMdjukNRV0vWlvq445HWsimAeIQ7erxuUC8IZw2C8N0v+OAsuIFpEjgJ9Pp7aLhqlBKo4z68QwBPWhftRPbcsbyPJ1Sujc7YDJqosBBLTKGWbSs
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-reqs-rfc3316update
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 08:14:46 -0000

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:04 PM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:

> **
>
> [Med] Consider the case the MIFed device is connected to both a 3G network
> and WiFI hotspot simultaneously: if the hotspot and the 3G are managed by
> the same provider, then policies to offload (some of traffic) can be
> enforced using specific routes. But if these networks are not managed by
> same entities and each of them are sending specific routes, wouldn't be
> there potential conflict in the policies? What would be the behaviour of
> the device?
>
> Longest-prefix match, just like it is today. If you want the wifi to have
preference, just announce more specifics on the wifi and you're done.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email