IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-reqs-rfc3316update

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Thu, 27 September 2012 12:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353D021F860F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.972
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.972 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.048, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o78hsW-6aDqK for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565EB21F85A8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm05.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.1]) by omfedm14.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 3533122C68C; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:38:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCH61.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.32]) by omfedm05.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id F3EFB35C0DE; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:38:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.8]) by PUEXCH61.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.32]) with mapi; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:38:50 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:38:49 +0200
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-reqs-rfc3316update
Thread-Index: Ac2cqxY9eSEM6wG3Qi2fPnF0ft+ZbQAAGOHQ
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5E44E1D7@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <1B2E7539FECD9048B261B791B1B24A7C3EBE458308@PUEXCB1A.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5B123A8C@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <20120925133859.15A2.8FE1F57E@jpix.ad.jp> <523CF185-5C72-4299-B4DA-3CEDBA7466D3@gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5E44DED0@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr2CRmEd+-+2NGPwfrgfJrge4GHk=Xeba-A7PbxDKaSVgw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr2CRmEd+-+2NGPwfrgfJrge4GHk=Xeba-A7PbxDKaSVgw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5E44E1D7PUEXCB1Bnante_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.9.27.113630
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-reqs-rfc3316update
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:38:53 -0000

Dear Lonezo,

As there are several channels which may be used to provision the dns info, we thought it is useful to provide a guideline for the host which information to select.

This modification is only added in my local copy. If you think this is not a good idea or it does not make senses, etc, your comment is welcome.

Cheers,
Med


________________________________
De : Lorenzo Colitti [mailto:lorenzo@google.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 27 septembre 2012 14:24
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
Cc : jouni korhonen; MAWATARI Masataka; v6ops@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-reqs-rfc3316update

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:04 PM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>> wrote:
                 If the cellular host receives the DNS information in
                 several channels, the following preference order MUST
                 be followed:
                 1.     PCO
                 2.     RA
                 3.     DHCPv6

Why does this order need to be specified in this document?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email