Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-07.txt

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Thu, 13 November 2014 20:00 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A0F1ACF19 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:00:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XjQwd-hITgWu for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:00:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16B0E1ACF08 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:00:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6E9631B2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:59:58 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 874456094A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:59:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 36938 invoked by uid 1007); 13 Nov 2014 20:59:58 +0100
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:59:58 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Message-ID: <20141113195958.GZ31092@Space.Net>
References: <20141111054026.11197.49784.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5461A23D.5020506@gmail.com> <546264A5.4050309@umn.edu> <546271A2.907@gmail.com> <5463C716.1030805@umn.edu> <54646DBE.9060800@dougbarton.us> <20141113084029.GT31092@Space.Net> <5464E4F6.9070401@gmail.com> <5465021A.2080305@dougbarton.us> <BAD445F2-2A65-4169-B12A-ED7DC6067F81@employees.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BAD445F2-2A65-4169-B12A-ED7DC6067F81@employees.org>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/KGp1n6j92Ue5tDJXF8ZDtEB6_xM
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-07.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:00:03 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 09:52:48AM -1000, Ole Troan wrote:
> it certainly would be interesting to hear what existing use cases there are for peer to peer mode 6to4 (as in without relays). I also have a hard time understanding the usefulness of keeping any of it.

Well, access to hosts behind a router with one global IPv4 address and
a 6to4 gateway in it comes to mind - without having to configure explicit
NAT mappings on the router.  I think this is Keith's scenario.

(Client has working global IPv4, Router has working global IPv4, neither
has v6, but peer-to-peer 6to4 enables access to inside LAN with 2002: 
addresses derived from Router's v4 address)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279