IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-07.txt

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Tue, 11 November 2014 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018FB1AC3CC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:56:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id McHp5oPp_xPz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:56:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com (blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com [130.76.32.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A9401A1A70 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:56:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id sABKuiUk016419; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:56:44 -0800
Received: from XCH-PHX-310.sw.nos.boeing.com (xch-phx-310.sw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.25.169]) by blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id sABKuhkn016410 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=OK); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:56:43 -0800
Received: from XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com ([169.254.4.66]) by XCH-PHX-310.sw.nos.boeing.com ([169.254.10.151]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:56:43 -0800
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-07.txt
Thread-Index: AQHP/XKY5DZQl323D0+A8e1MQXithJxb3HrwgACMh4D//3+IUA==
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:56:42 +0000
Message-ID: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832D83873@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <20141111054026.11197.49784.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5461A23D.5020506@gmail.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832D8366D@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <546272D7.9090208@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <546272D7.9090208@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.247.104.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ySN6Szbqlt9WTHs_qZ7oqCaanEg
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-07.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:56:46 -0000

Hi Brian,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 12:35 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-07.txt
> 
> On 12/11/2014 09:21, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> > Hi Brian,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
> >> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 9:44 PM
> >> To: v6ops@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-07.txt
> >>
> >> This is intended to incorporate the result of today's discussion.
> >> Please let the authors know if we got it wrong.
> >
> > It looks like you are not intending to include a section on candidate 6to4
> > replacements then (we had some discussion on those on the list).
> 
> That was the message I got (i.e. discussing alternatives is out of scope for
> *this* document).

Maybe we should just put "Obsoletes RFC3056, RFC3068" in the header of AERO?

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

>    Brian
> 
> If there
> > will be a consideration for replacements, I would like to add ip-proto-44
> > encapsulation to the list, i.e., tunneling over IPv6 Fragment Header. By that,
> > I mean IPv6-in-IPv6FH-in-IPv4 encapsulation. I talk about this in a new draft
> > on "AERO Minimal Encapsulation":
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-aeromin/
> >
> > Note that in a "compressed" format not all packets need to include the
> > IPv6 FH, though. In that case, these "compressed" packets would look just
> > like ip-proto-41.
> >
> > Thanks - Fred
> > fred.l.templin@boeing.com
> >

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email