IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-07.txt

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Thu, 13 November 2014 08:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3195D1A6F5B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:37:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SqC3SWW-cZDE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:37:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dougbarton.us (dougbarton.us [208.79.90.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D32FB1A1A8C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:37:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bcn-dbarton.lan (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:d:92:54c1:a492:84b1:e223]) by dougbarton.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F26122B0D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 08:37:19 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dougbarton.us; s=dkim; t=1415867839; bh=JZEaEM42sEbky/YlR8ZudioHgvsJNw5nZmUh55fX3WY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=OBlQHptl8VMiwiccuNPxdDkVqvEfi73JdvcOUWsSqJtdypeMdHzZdKG4DHx8TqjCn Shmehi2iIpE+J+PxyxnsGFI//mo9W4NqRJEnjsHe8IZ7HA4j3+D2oj8rwcgHdBsjw3 zxaxIrdWjxKgCyGCLVutbssi3iAlvGSfbp5isXBY=
Message-ID: <54646DBE.9060800@dougbarton.us>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:37:18 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <20141111054026.11197.49784.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5461A23D.5020506@gmail.com> <546264A5.4050309@umn.edu> <546271A2.907@gmail.com> <5463C716.1030805@umn.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5463C716.1030805@umn.edu>
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/k94HHDHMI86ao3ib_E6sej1QxRw
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-07.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 08:37:21 -0000

On 11/12/14 12:46 PM, David Farmer wrote:
> On my first pass I missed the current title "Deprecating Connection of
> IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4)", this implies more than is intended
> by the current consensus.  So, I'd suggest the title be changed to
> reflect the new scope of the Draft, how about "Deprecating the Anycast
> Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers".

Am I the only one who thinks that we should chuck the whole thing?

Doug

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email