IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-07.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 11 November 2014 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C981A9133 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:34:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y1ImCiaE34mV for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:34:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 086ED1A9125 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:34:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id y19so1710814wgg.7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:34:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HpXZtWPqXaB3ppB2UQ5YX/FdEMyLludNneEzOJO1pcY=; b=0+mtBTrMivOvIoihb9RUnPnz/qIYhTYgzF7DcO8rzSuZ+28a9Ve8Uslx5xv6GSoJ2n 3Z4eiWy4KKWWvtiRMnOepaoj9Fu5OB7DF3E8G8LoF+lq1M1MiHBNA/aGmX1jzaOvFIoP yIbGJ3/NYzu9T58ItaoPvu7VwA1k/jINm1gepRBHqZBcue5hV4PmBKRDnVpTNCCQAhZn YUP3WQHJbfmiNfmq665WBdTXOWYExNeuRMtG7DQwweGDSQYqv5nUB/6pS/up9GBMxGXq 89ate2PBV9W72YY5PwyUJV15QIBeSuV7opYaw3svMK4X9MNxwzRGhAtNNJswOBXrEpzj zSjQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.71.6 with SMTP id q6mr56911131wju.98.1415738069863; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:34:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [31.133.163.84] (dhcp-a354.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.163.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v10sm18895756wiy.21.2014.11.11.12.34.28 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:34:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <546272D7.9090208@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:34:31 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
References: <20141111054026.11197.49784.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5461A23D.5020506@gmail.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832D8366D@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832D8366D@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/lyhYTfrdDQB80Ba8iPu1mkyBBm0
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-07.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:34:40 -0000

On 12/11/2014 09:21, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
>> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 9:44 PM
>> To: v6ops@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-07.txt
>>
>> This is intended to incorporate the result of today's discussion.
>> Please let the authors know if we got it wrong.
> 
> It looks like you are not intending to include a section on candidate 6to4
> replacements then (we had some discussion on those on the list). 

That was the message I got (i.e. discussing alternatives is out of scope for
*this* document).

   Brian

If there
> will be a consideration for replacements, I would like to add ip-proto-44
> encapsulation to the list, i.e., tunneling over IPv6 Fragment Header. By that,
> I mean IPv6-in-IPv6FH-in-IPv4 encapsulation. I talk about this in a new draft
> on "AERO Minimal Encapsulation":
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-aeromin/
> 
> Note that in a "compressed" format not all packets need to include the
> IPv6 FH, though. In that case, these "compressed" packets would look just
> like ip-proto-41.
> 
> Thanks - Fred
> fred.l.templin@boeing.com
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email