IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-07.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 14 November 2014 00:00 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926DC1AE368 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:00:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YgznQrLaABwL for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:00:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A51721AE33C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:00:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id y19so7243043wgg.21 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:00:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GRbfuY/dHbtyrott+KHUNB8z2In5YdUpV/hyfw6xJ/I=; b=AEnKAWz+lX3HbqH0ytGQYiS9HNQvq4kTsw8B9XRZcl6iJbWQ5tBImAPMPco3QEIR8P l3rTP174lZAWmoyH64TQsQ2F7Py/cEW6o1fMuLl8FGAI7wAoELU2kcePac0R+ny7xqUd EIhlqUU9H8AlnR8RSiXMGx8B/bSoJ3sZvXPdsM5UuYIsKQzRsD4Dh0fgkNWaBfODutvG 1u8CSnj27v2QD8P+agUE7O9kVBEeTeo6QnXt3EQMQ99TUuvSePRAHnIJWpZmJb6ZRLiy bvu16Vy40wi1uNnqk4Ck2sW1hNkiPhsPAtZYEEOWouGTmcP5b5HTbk9WmoB4NGqUVPkj hG2A==
X-Received: by 10.180.93.132 with SMTP id cu4mr2589494wib.46.1415923253417; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:00:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [31.133.163.84] (dhcp-a354.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.163.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wx3sm37455940wjc.19.2014.11.13.16.00.52 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:00:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5465463C.1000508@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:01:00 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
References: <20141111054026.11197.49784.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5461A23D.5020506@gmail.com> <546264A5.4050309@umn.edu> <546271A2.907@gmail.com> <5463C716.1030805@umn.edu> <54653AB0.1020903@gmail.com> <54653FB5.6010402@jvknet.com> <CADhXe52gBM1fRW8QNVxHmt0bpdca=csy1DqSK-u-J_agLDpbxQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADhXe52gBM1fRW8QNVxHmt0bpdca=csy1DqSK-u-J_agLDpbxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/k1Z_9pcWE9j_iNUzRiF8Q0grfus
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-07.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:56 -0000

Well, it isn't right now, but we certainly can do that if Victor
so advises. However, I'm not going to issue a -09 version just for that.

   Brian

On 14/11/2014 12:54, James Woodyatt wrote:
> RFC 6732 is obsoleted by this draft, isn't it?
> 
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com> wrote:
> 
>> v6OPS WG,
>>
>> A natural association to deprecating RFC3068 and the removal of routing
>> the 192.88.99.0/24 prefix will be the cessation of RFC6732 operation
>> where it's enabled/implemented.  This is expected and a good thing.
>>
>> Not sure if this should be mentioned specifically in the draft or not.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Victor K
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email