IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv6 Extension Headers in the Real World

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 02 October 2014 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3215F1A8A94 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.287
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JizuCoQ5FaqH for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A29BC1A8F34 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1020; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1412270825; x=1413480425; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=obg57S7TrG1vEdxJ88TXnkHhxtn/ppa4eWC6bqizF/U=; b=dnLr4uxZeih/ZJbU0A8gayj2QsLKm7gL9B4oT21KCCC68rQSQpKWY/MX ax1Zae3JhTnZOaujoWLAAkAp+F3/zNEvmOYfTJSWQ8xk2VrDfInVDeo3H zw9fPssLdKTg5OsgTOO7eecjI29shL6GJX7xC/FB+mdXoBG2CrP9xP5vy M=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgcFAHuKLVStJV2Q/2dsb2JhbABgDoMAgSwE0jICgQ0WAXuEBAEBAwF5BQsCAQhGMiUCBA4FDg2IGwi9aQEXkCYHgy6BHQWRbYILgUyHb5VzgyNAbIFIgQIBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,640,1406592000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="360192794"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Oct 2014 17:27:05 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s92HR3Nl021498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 2 Oct 2014 17:27:03 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.15]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:27:03 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] IPv6 Extension Headers in the Real World
Thread-Index: AQHP3mYUoIhO7eAC4EW9CLhXMbng+w==
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 17:27:03 +0000
Message-ID: <121A1546-7D1B-4938-8E9E-F6BE15C23BAF@cisco.com>
References: <542A36AC.9030203@gont.com.ar> <542C81B7.10601@isi.edu> <99A3738D-954C-4A75-8055-E30D0D73DD80@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|fe883999a173b6d6b6b574badb6ebb53q90Niq03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|99A3738D-954C-4A75-8055-E30D0D73DD80@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <542C8595.6080809@isi.edu> <CAKD1Yr2JB6V61D+JcUR2qj6-AGEAQr+Jn0eOUPSLEOKXZ1cEqw@mail.gmail.com> <9062DD5BB047BF4C96BCE0CB9DA96D1B4DE1C0C7@ITSNT440.iowa.uiowa.edu> <E69F8B2A-C8F9-4978-B2F8-0F6C74619BA0@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|0e9b5822392d744642b47f8f3cb94f76q91ED603tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|E69F8B2A-C8F9-4978-B2F8-0F6C74619BA0@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <542D695A.3070506@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <542D695A.3070506@isi.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.121]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9B83CA71-B26F-4D6B-95FB-EA94D5752B53"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/SbQ-z57w58T58CUPZxUTwHOCnsQ
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, "draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world@tools.ietf.org" <draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world@tools.ietf.org>, V6ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6 Extension Headers in the Real World
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 17:27:06 -0000

On Oct 2, 2014, at 8:03 AM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote:

> So I disagree with the entire logic of the idea of sequential publication in this case. It only opens up continued need for coordination between WGs.

One solution to that would be to discuss both documents in the same working group. I’m open as to which.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email