IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv6 Extension Headers in the Real World

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Mon, 06 October 2014 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8E11A0309 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 08:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.686
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.686 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0zR9Pi8vraBF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 08:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from darkstar.isi.edu (darkstar.isi.edu [128.9.128.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1870D1A02F6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 08:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.8] (pool-71-103-148-36.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.103.148.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by darkstar.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s96Fiat7024198 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 6 Oct 2014 08:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5432B8E6.7050108@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 08:44:38 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <542A36AC.9030203@gont.com.ar> <542C81B7.10601@isi.edu> <99A3738D-954C-4A75-8055-E30D0D73DD80@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|fe883999a173b6d6b6b574badb6ebb53q90Niq03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|99A3738D-954C-4A75-8055-E30D0D73DD80@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <542C8595.6080809@isi.edu> <CAKD1Yr2JB6V61D+JcUR2qj6-AGEAQr+Jn0eOUPSLEOKXZ1cEqw@mail.gmail.com> <9062DD5BB047BF4C96BCE0CB9DA96D1B4DE1C0C7@ITSNT440.iowa.uiowa.edu> <E69F8B2A-C8F9-4978-B2F8-0F6C74619BA0@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|0e9b5822392d744642b47f8f3cb94f76q91ED603tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|E69F8B2A-C8F9-4978-B2F8-0F6C74619BA0@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <542D695A.3070506@isi.edu> <9062DD5BB047BF4C96BCE0CB9DA96D1B4DE22159@ITSNT440.iowa.uiowa.edu> <542EAFEF.30607@gont.com.ar> <542EF0BA.2070604@isi.edu> <08B266AA-2C78-4C21-BF76-F4B64C9B56CC@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|fba318d9629281f51901ef8c456d7f83q94E2e03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|08B266AA-2C78-4C21-BF76-F4B64C9B56CC@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <5432B4E1.1050908@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5432B4E1.1050908@isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/juep3_LH3n5_MmaKGA_zq44NN_E
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, "draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world@tools.ietf.org" <draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world@tools.ietf.org>, V6ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6 Extension Headers in the Real World
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:45:50 -0000


On 10/6/2014 8:27 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
> 
...
> Although I appreciate that everyone thinks that "this can be
> coordinated", we're seeing ample evidence to the contrary. It's useful
> to note here that NEITHER DOC REFERENCES THE OTHER, despite being
> written by the same author (which begs the question of "end run").

Correction: the latest OPSEC doc does cite the V6OPS one in a throw-away
sentence of the intro, but fails to explain in detail how the two docs
are linked.

(it also cites "recent studies" - plural - even though only the authors'
own study is the only one cited)

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email