IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [lisp] Comments to draft-mlevy-v6ops-auto-v6-allocation-per-asn

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sun, 24 February 2013 07:44 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1ABB21F8FF2; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:44:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qiiHg1EE0Q0C; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:44:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E0921F8FF1; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:44:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1O7hM7j004864; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:43:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1361691810; bh=bHaSNyrKmxDYJTLOcMkzcZ+4JXwTLMDfkKP1H/D7Cpo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=wD5LWX9/3vJBvhgB7CY29Gzsc/bbutnodi0T3xVvHtQgsuaOyUswXD2NEjqqy7Cg4 qRS7eKag5ISb3sxlyBOUNVxcqoaMmnOEFQ9c/3g9gdjQ1l43Ctcgv2/WybY5RKbgIY +WqDfh3ZlyUZuWxTolCy1Vr4zqsS6YZdq+Gg3udI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1361691810; i=@resistor.net; bh=bHaSNyrKmxDYJTLOcMkzcZ+4JXwTLMDfkKP1H/D7Cpo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=OoUANnU9gY55jlkl5IEP6L8YZHkkN/OSfAeEU2SDPp49gq8NKHmvuQhYsICHkUWCc D6P9CVt8oJnt5/BdG+CteVvMbbeOGnqmoegG9v8B/wzNtD4cz4gYqF74faHyn8u5ju 680f7YBOIivQtuwLbmp/FseInHdh/C27LF0sMLm0=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130223222210.0ade7d68@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:31:40 -0800
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BD9BBB37-9CDB-4A6F-8CEB-F14D7F3E50F3@delong.com>
References: <4E8BC25E-79FF-4CF9-9E95-40904DE1D4D6@gmail.com> <7466F234-1BBE-4985-BBFC-B56A38D8F5F3@delong.com> <9D60BB7D-2325-489C-9225-22213DD6155A@gmail.com> <BD9BBB37-9CDB-4A6F-8CEB-F14D7F3E50F3@delong.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: "Martin J. Levy" <martin@he.net>, v6ops@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [lisp] Comments to draft-mlevy-v6ops-auto-v6-allocation-per-asn
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 07:44:08 -0000

At 17:09 19-02-2013, Owen DeLong wrote:
>One of us is misunderstanding the other. My point is that using IPv6 
>address space to number things that are not IPv6 hosts is, IMHO, a bad idea.

It's not the first time that the idea came up.  It's not because 
there is a seemingly infinite source of integers that they should be 
assigned to any thing.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email