IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Comments to draft-mlevy-v6ops-auto-v6-allocation-per-asn

Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie> Tue, 19 February 2013 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@inex.ie>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F9321F8E59; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:07:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5He936JEkJE4; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:07:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5267821F8E4C; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:07:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelope-To: lisp@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.foobar.org ([IPv6:2001:4d68:2002:100::110]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.14.4/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1JI4IIM036666 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:04:18 GMT (envelope-from nick@inex.ie)
Message-ID: <5123BF44.9020302@inex.ie>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:07:00 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
References: <4E8BC25E-79FF-4CF9-9E95-40904DE1D4D6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E8BC25E-79FF-4CF9-9E95-40904DE1D4D6@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
X-Company-Info-1: Internet Neutral Exchange Association Limited. Registered in Ireland No. 253804
X-Company-Info-2: Registered Offices: 1-2, Marino Mart, Fairview, Dublin 3
X-Company-Info-3: Internet Neutral Exchange Association Limited is limited by guarantee
X-Company-Info-4: Offices: 4027 Kingswood Road, Citywest, Dublin 24.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, "lisp@ietf.org list list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Comments to draft-mlevy-v6ops-auto-v6-allocation-per-asn
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:07:14 -0000

On 19/02/2013 17:12, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>    not forced to use this allocation and can ignore this completely.
>>    Availability of the /48 assignment via this mechanism does not change
>>    existing mechanisms for obtaining IPv6 assignments through the
>>    existing RIR (Regional Internet Registry) or LIR (Local Internet
>>    Registry) mechanisms.
> 
> This is a good idea PROVIDED these prefixes are not injected into the
> core routing system.

I don't think that this is a realistic expectation.  If people get blocks
of this form, they will turn up in the dfz for sure.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email