Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 01 April 2015 00:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B0C1B29FF for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MH-arbbwpVJk for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3D361A8747 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.16] (unknown [120.149.147.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72A3F22E1F4; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:52:10 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
Subject: Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CABP3xjyV80p2Y2rj6JUSKAro1vRziSntUmQPzM06g563h8J4jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:52:07 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4820CA4B-C98B-4CC8-BDE5-83A5C7A5CE57@mnot.net>
References: <CABP3xjyV80p2Y2rj6JUSKAro1vRziSntUmQPzM06g563h8J4jw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick Stahlberg <pstahlb@google.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wellknown-uri-review/75lkTLwjnWfYyXr94sJc4g4Chqs>
Cc: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wellknown-uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:52:20 -0000

Hi Patrick,

Sure. Best thing to do is to ping this list once your spec becomes public (even in draft form), and we’ll do the registration.

Cheers,


> On 1 Apr 2015, at 5:20 am, Patrick Stahlberg <pstahlb@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am writing on behalf of a team at Google working on new ways to surface associations between web sites and other online "assets".  For a planned launch, we would like to register the well-known URI "associations.json" as requested in RFC 5785.
> 
> We would like to ask web site owners to publish a file at this location that follows a simple JSON format and that includes information about other assets that are related to the site on which the associations.json is published.  We plan for the format to be open and usable by anyone.  We would like to publish a full specification of the format once we have enough confidence internally in its design.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Patrick
> _______________________________________________
> wellknown-uri-review mailing list
> wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/