Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] [AD] <u>: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9290 <draft-ietf-core-problem-details-08> for your review

[Thomas Fossati <[e-mail]>]

I also approve publication, and agree with the slight rewording that Carsten proposes below.

Cheers, thanks very much!

On 08/09/2022, 07:24, "Carsten Bormann" <[e-mail]> wrote:

On 8. Sep 2022, at 01:45, Sandy Ginoza <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hi All, Murray*,
>
> The document has been updated with the NEW text shown below.  Based on your replies and the input from Peter and John, we believe there are no objections to publishing the RFC (however the files may display on various applications).
>
> Authors, please review the files and confirm that you approve the RFC for publication.

I do approve the RFC-to-be for publication.

That said, I can’t help to note that the text around the new artwork is slightly agrammatical to me; maybe

OLD:
The example shows how the Hebrew-language string is represented</t>
<artwork>
שלום
</artwork>

<t>where in direction of reading, the sequence of characters is:


NEW:
The example shows how the Hebrew-language string</t>
<artwork>
שלום
</artwork>

<t>is represented, where in direction of reading, the sequence of characters is:


Grüße, Carsten



>
> * Murray, please review the updates to Appendix A and let us know if you approve.
>
>
> The files are available here:
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290.txt
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290.pdf
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290.html
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290.xml
>
> Diffs of the more recent updates:
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290-lastdiff.html
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side)
>
> AUTH48 diff:
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290-auth48diff.html
>
> Comprehensive diffs:
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290-diff.html
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>
>
> Thank you,
> Sandy
>
>
>
>
>> On Sep 7, 2022, at 12:35 AM, Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>> *Maybe* we could inline a caveat to warn readers about the possibly
>>> surprising rendering, depending on their viewer programme.
>>
>> As in:
>>
>> OLD:
>>> The following example shows how the Hebrew-language string
>>
>> NEW:
>>> The following example uses right-to-left (RTL) script, which in the context of this specification may be rendered differently by different document presentation environments.  The descriptive text may be more reliable to follow than the necessarily device- and application-specific rendering.
>>> The example shows how the Hebrew-language string
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Grüße, Carsten
>>
>> --
>> Xml-sg-cmt mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sg-cmt
>
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.