IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] [AD] <u>: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9290 <draft-ietf-core-problem-details-08> for your review

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 12 September 2022 10:52 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF046C1522B2; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 03:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id plE7peiJn37E; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 03:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABFA8C14CF1B; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 03:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p5089abf5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.171.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MR3Mr57fgzDCg2; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 12:52:40 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <1B242483-1E4E-4ECE-972A-871BA046049B@tzi.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 12:52:39 +0200
Cc: Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@arm.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "core-chairs@ietf.org" <core-chairs@ietf.org>, "auth48archive@rfc-editor.org" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>, Jaime Jiménez <jaime@iki.fi>, "core-ads@ietf.org" <core-ads@ietf.org>, "xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org" <xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>, Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>, Alexis Rossi <rsce@rfc-editor.org>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <09F4BF47-84A8-4F37-A1F9-345761CC04A7@tzi.org>
References: <20220804195913.906BF55ECC@rfcpa.amsl.com> <557D1A94-9729-4D7E-90B4-D53B6A0DEDEE@tzi.org> <DB9PR08MB6524313A6D026E0F63B483AF9C719@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <629C2E8C-A79C-4CBF-AE49-CEC9C8C0B5F2@amsl.com> <69949BE3-B08B-4780-9FE5-ABA415DFBECA@tzi.org> <C9D1D91E-706C-41EC-8358-FE6D2D15ADF0@tzi.org> <DB9PR08MB6524FE3B48BFEE73627B58D69C709@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <4018FA5D-1031-437C-B9D6-A496A6B100B8@tzi.org> <7E8CED15-A7F7-4F9B-B54D-C858B7E64255@amsl.com> <40DB4CD3-2D93-4481-BFB6-7F374A4128B6@tzi.org> <37BDB141-B704-476E-BC06-C58AD319CAA7@amsl.com> <0DB1E862-25B5-491C-ACC1-13AD9ED9743B@tzi.org> <DB9PR08MB6524DBA3C87BDBF8BAE1F7FA9C419@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <62BA61C2-0558-4C4F-A138-11F8C8EF159E@tzi.org> <76F4210F-CDB4-4824-824E-79BF9E4CAE08@amsl.com> <CAL0qLwa9sQZqWe8c-pgAobA__feSY=+68rUkryK2EEYMc9DVBg@mail.gmail.com> <1B242483-1E4E-4ECE-972A-871BA046049B@tzi.org>
To: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml-sg-cmt/S9LSXFBhqqIbdY0ySknkhNSTshM>
Subject: Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] [AD] <u>: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9290 <draft-ietf-core-problem-details-08> for your review
X-BeenThere: xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working list for the xml and style guide change management team <xml-sg-cmt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml-sg-cmt/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:52:48 -0000

What should the authors of RFC 9290-to-be do next?

Grüße, Carsten


> On 8. Sep 2022, at 11:11, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2022-09-08, at 10:36, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Looks OK to me, except that in the modified part of that appendix, "RTL" is all-caps in one place but then all lowercase in the next spot.  Shouldn't they be consistent?
> 
> The other usages of “rtl” in the document are in combinations such as “base-rtl”, or as an echo of the CDDL name given in A.2.
> 
> In the sentence leading in to the example, RTL is given as a plain-english abbreviation of “right-to-left”, which is good for search engines.  Experience indicates that it is good if examples are self-contained, so an implementer that only uses the example still can derive value from it.  The second occurrence in the text for the example is again an echo of the CDDL name (and is styled in typewriter font).
> 
> So, no, I don’t think they need to be (or should be) consistent in capitalization.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email