IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] [AD] Re: <u>: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9290 <draft-ietf-core-problem-details-08> for your review

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 08 September 2022 08:36 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5ACC14F73E; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 01:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kPyK8WyUJyC7; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 01:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34838C1524A4; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 01:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id a70so7108036edf.10; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 01:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=5bzCoskNAN+KT4wVwCOC+h0NSf2utuoNmNgZGurGfg4=; b=a3bRFMLroPJOSVtrRDxkUX1KQ/qiZKylDGnpI5C12JwD8HOJAYjDdkwFuMYvpFhi10 xM0U75gIEQtjHMnoaApuorpAiMeAnNLVha4/LPhZkLUQwn8GZLIMefIy26MnpLTXVPw4 pa66AyhVLTx7MrRUa2g+1SmoUXXlclMGhP9ssGG0TlegxuxzlJpWax+yjx68AeKkNz/F 2a+ZwuRiv8NU9MEUMl6nqvxIF4FZIvEenrJnWQQLEbZBwJVhtj63gdWYihgJ8+ricK0V 2qAyLS1yw1GduNMbxGAIjwQY5fIl2L9l0eFDOClYL9rqNSIzue8GlpQBK30Nh/eiSN6E XFRQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=5bzCoskNAN+KT4wVwCOC+h0NSf2utuoNmNgZGurGfg4=; b=cW5iofDa8glRjZ/+FmEOiFBHnImq5hUgEx7eA4msAludpo4CQVCNmJeXcEmHGvvuVK XGFMrd9ixqfWsWDHApMwaz+SKYp3eQA4YTGuVN9nmfqRVPqzw4svBSHYoKKi9e8gx6oZ skCUh+Vsqpg5bPTES2qLisoflBa1QZNJoJD2mL5H080KQo/wkkAPJ2RDe3Fp7gsabMvT h/8VqAi/8mGK4wf+Suel09MHVAu6yddvyOumPN/ERQwe4h8FtfZrHkKcfhZtMwQouSHA ZKQH5kfncyNpo839ngkxJW22qPROjNiwZgrM/tfcbumsLrirvHDSyFsCieZnb/BGpNWL d5Ag==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2CXS8OiIhfYyU+qxOlKNX3rE4han0nb6oGkSWGgh4l1dpoARTx rMHS1frsNFrSvIGLD5d5dguqWB/rUXsxvcUE8A8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR73EGMaLKv9pER2X4A/3aJVfSvtdaQZzEoZcK/TKE9deciYlhNtIZtXEsqh+1Ry2ZyJ/QueLsbo9+liULvVGVg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:43c4:b0:43b:c5eb:c9dd with SMTP id p4-20020a05640243c400b0043bc5ebc9ddmr6134095edc.402.1662626211324; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 01:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220804195913.906BF55ECC@rfcpa.amsl.com> <557D1A94-9729-4D7E-90B4-D53B6A0DEDEE@tzi.org> <DB9PR08MB6524313A6D026E0F63B483AF9C719@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <629C2E8C-A79C-4CBF-AE49-CEC9C8C0B5F2@amsl.com> <69949BE3-B08B-4780-9FE5-ABA415DFBECA@tzi.org> <C9D1D91E-706C-41EC-8358-FE6D2D15ADF0@tzi.org> <DB9PR08MB6524FE3B48BFEE73627B58D69C709@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <4018FA5D-1031-437C-B9D6-A496A6B100B8@tzi.org> <7E8CED15-A7F7-4F9B-B54D-C858B7E64255@amsl.com> <40DB4CD3-2D93-4481-BFB6-7F374A4128B6@tzi.org> <37BDB141-B704-476E-BC06-C58AD319CAA7@amsl.com> <0DB1E862-25B5-491C-ACC1-13AD9ED9743B@tzi.org> <DB9PR08MB6524DBA3C87BDBF8BAE1F7FA9C419@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <62BA61C2-0558-4C4F-A138-11F8C8EF159E@tzi.org> <76F4210F-CDB4-4824-824E-79BF9E4CAE08@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <76F4210F-CDB4-4824-824E-79BF9E4CAE08@amsl.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 01:36:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwa9sQZqWe8c-pgAobA__feSY=+68rUkryK2EEYMc9DVBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@arm.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "core-chairs@ietf.org" <core-chairs@ietf.org>, "auth48archive@rfc-editor.org" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>, Jaime Jiménez <jaime@iki.fi>, "core-ads@ietf.org" <core-ads@ietf.org>, "xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org" <xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>, Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>, Alexis Rossi <rsce@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b8690305e826547d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml-sg-cmt/fGsxSZdMbbLFErI_TqKBARksJMo>
Subject: Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] [AD] Re: <u>: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9290 <draft-ietf-core-problem-details-08> for your review
X-BeenThere: xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working list for the xml and style guide change management team <xml-sg-cmt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml-sg-cmt/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 08:36:57 -0000

Looks OK to me, except that in the modified part of that appendix, "RTL" is
all-caps in one place but then all lowercase in the next spot.  Shouldn't
they be consistent?

-MSK, ART AD

On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 4:45 PM Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com> wrote:

> Hi All, Murray*,
>
> The document has been updated with the NEW text shown below.  Based on
> your replies and the input from Peter and John, we believe there are no
> objections to publishing the RFC (however the files may display on various
> applications).
>
> Authors, please review the files and confirm that you approve the RFC for
> publication.
>
> * Murray, please review the updates to Appendix A and let us know if you
> approve.
>
>
> The files are available here:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290.txt
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290.pdf
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290.html
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290.xml
>
> Diffs of the more recent updates:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290-lastdiff.html
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290-lastrfcdiff.html (side by
> side)
>
> AUTH48 diff:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290-auth48diff.html
>
> Comprehensive diffs:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290-diff.html
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9290-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>
>
> Thank you,
> Sandy
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 7, 2022, at 12:35 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> >
> >> *Maybe* we could inline a caveat to warn readers about the possibly
> >> surprising rendering, depending on their viewer programme.
> >
> > As in:
> >
> > OLD:
> >> The following example shows how the Hebrew-language string
> >
> > NEW:
> >> The following example uses right-to-left (RTL) script, which in the
> context of this specification may be rendered differently by different
> document presentation environments.  The descriptive text may be more
> reliable to follow than the necessarily device- and application-specific
> rendering.
> >> The example shows how the Hebrew-language string
> >
> > ?
> >
> > Grüße, Carsten
> >
> > --
> > Xml-sg-cmt mailing list
> > Xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sg-cmt
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email