IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] [AD] <u>: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9290 <draft-ietf-core-problem-details-08> for your review

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 08 September 2022 09:11 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42A5C14F73A; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 02:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PQ45nSDQP_78; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 02:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82CA0C14F74F; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 02:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from client-0116.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0116.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MNYK90jNXzDCfH; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 11:11:41 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwa9sQZqWe8c-pgAobA__feSY=+68rUkryK2EEYMc9DVBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 11:11:40 +0200
Cc: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>, Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@arm.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "core-chairs@ietf.org" <core-chairs@ietf.org>, "auth48archive@rfc-editor.org" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>, Jaime Jiménez <jaime@iki.fi>, "core-ads@ietf.org" <core-ads@ietf.org>, "xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org" <xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>, Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>, Alexis Rossi <rsce@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 684321100.676423-58e661836bf68ac1bfc5902e51ee9836
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1B242483-1E4E-4ECE-972A-871BA046049B@tzi.org>
References: <20220804195913.906BF55ECC@rfcpa.amsl.com> <557D1A94-9729-4D7E-90B4-D53B6A0DEDEE@tzi.org> <DB9PR08MB6524313A6D026E0F63B483AF9C719@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <629C2E8C-A79C-4CBF-AE49-CEC9C8C0B5F2@amsl.com> <69949BE3-B08B-4780-9FE5-ABA415DFBECA@tzi.org> <C9D1D91E-706C-41EC-8358-FE6D2D15ADF0@tzi.org> <DB9PR08MB6524FE3B48BFEE73627B58D69C709@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <4018FA5D-1031-437C-B9D6-A496A6B100B8@tzi.org> <7E8CED15-A7F7-4F9B-B54D-C858B7E64255@amsl.com> <40DB4CD3-2D93-4481-BFB6-7F374A4128B6@tzi.org> <37BDB141-B704-476E-BC06-C58AD319CAA7@amsl.com> <0DB1E862-25B5-491C-ACC1-13AD9ED9743B@tzi.org> <DB9PR08MB6524DBA3C87BDBF8BAE1F7FA9C419@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <62BA61C2-0558-4C4F-A138-11F8C8EF159E@tzi.org> <76F4210F-CDB4-4824-824E-79BF9E4CAE08@amsl.com> <CAL0qLwa9sQZqWe8c-pgAobA__feSY=+68rUkryK2EEYMc9DVBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml-sg-cmt/BQ6HFUzn9w_yFtfmIMv7MeGHwvg>
Subject: Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] [AD] <u>: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9290 <draft-ietf-core-problem-details-08> for your review
X-BeenThere: xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working list for the xml and style guide change management team <xml-sg-cmt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml-sg-cmt/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 09:11:50 -0000

On 2022-09-08, at 10:36, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Looks OK to me, except that in the modified part of that appendix, "RTL" is all-caps in one place but then all lowercase in the next spot.  Shouldn't they be consistent?

The other usages of “rtl” in the document are in combinations such as “base-rtl”, or as an echo of the CDDL name given in A.2.

In the sentence leading in to the example, RTL is given as a plain-english abbreviation of “right-to-left”, which is good for search engines.  Experience indicates that it is good if examples are self-contained, so an implementer that only uses the example still can derive value from it.  The second occurrence in the text for the example is again an echo of the CDDL name (and is styled in typewriter font).

So, no, I don’t think they need to be (or should be) consistent in capitalization.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email