IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xml2rfc] RFC Bibtex format doi numbering incorrect

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 30 May 2017 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF396126CD8 for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZE1W8FX8XWqT for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (www.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A2CE124D37 for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 50681 invoked from network); 30 May 2017 21:04:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 30 May 2017 21:04:50 -0000
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 21:04:28 -0000
Message-ID: <20170530210428.65328.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: xml2rfc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <87zidu301h.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/3L1RVC329iUmibTpp9EYVsgNXJI>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] RFC Bibtex format doi numbering incorrect
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 21:04:54 -0000

In article <87zidu301h.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> you write:
>Heh...  Liking to nit-pick requirement statements, I would revise this
>to "you dereference it and verify that the bibliographic information you
>obtain matches that of the document you think the DOI is for".

Fair enough, although we could have quite the rabbit hole trying to
figure out how much fuzz between the DOI bibliographic stuff and
the document you want to tolerate.  In theory they're identical,
in practice things like authors' initials might not match.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email