IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xml2rfc] RFC Bibtex format doi numbering incorrect

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 30 May 2017 11:32 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28745129BD8 for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2017 04:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=H5VtcdIe; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=D0GXhkGn
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NYBRn-FV6u8N for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2017 04:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (www.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 877D7129BD4 for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 May 2017 04:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 68893 invoked from network); 30 May 2017 11:32:31 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=10d1b.592d584f.k1705; bh=E/fQgFDM6LAaW+pj8XlTG5tEhV/ddyM2pFYVxXTS40Y=; b=H5VtcdIerUB0C6tU3163XicYZwRxkSGHv49TW3ZKaEE3DZxzmyQd3XzeJ7ISpyoQBupzLYhKbiHwU7z9viGtTHyMYo/ebMuKI+eiO8NSR4Lb7PE1ngGnJnO6f4mWVZI0EJ0AcDOHYyon7PlC5EDWtu0GWS1en5BJTNvz9RJRCLJhRSOOJAHX6WUxV8op8u/FnpXbLzNnaxtAfpMpFO7r/asDM2fkMZQiegKcNsD4w4D20cKjqJYy25BrSaS3t4k5
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=10d1b.592d584f.k1705; bh=E/fQgFDM6LAaW+pj8XlTG5tEhV/ddyM2pFYVxXTS40Y=; b=D0GXhkGnLPUZH69By5JpKtSabyLQDQjFShg0nQC6C0UrPVr1ur4uL45gwiqpIZ6ll8Mfxw9WtrJlngmsuLfO+VbpkC63o6H5XoAwGK0CmruX9s2v1ZpuE7rjkVRQLnq25s73ObJYnG1O8szxg4gWp1/R9oFxcvMrZM+fwNfb5iMSvtgB/Z6yAUNvYpizK5ot1blM6CLTkCb/pIFo7H8bHK+TLFYXHJwd9MixhoquTAZgOLyO4AYQEd1lmjiBXnr5
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 30 May 2017 11:32:31 -0000
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 07:32:31 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1705300727320.54264@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <e79db540-0ddf-f8bf-f3c6-7890315fb814@gmx.de>
References: <20170526165214.45384.qmail@ary.lan> <592C9B8F.2050504@levkowetz.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1705291809080.51625@ary.qy> <e79db540-0ddf-f8bf-f3c6-7890315fb814@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/Cuom7i40Ua0Ht6ZwjgTayv-vxYo>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] RFC Bibtex format doi numbering incorrect
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 11:32:37 -0000

> The code we're talking about is *validation* code.

The way you validate a DOI is easy: you dereference it.  If the DOI is 
10.1234/something, you look up https://dx.doi.org/10.1234/something.  If 
it's valid, you'll get something back, if it isn't, you won't.  If your 
query accepts accept application/rdf+xml you will get back the document's 
bibliographic info in XML.

This works for all DOIs, not just RFCs.

Examples here: http://citation.crosscite.org/docs.html

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email