IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xml2rfc] [django-project] RFC Bibtex format doi numbering incorrect

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 25 May 2017 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A321126D74 for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 May 2017 14:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pg5gRmb9s7mO for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 May 2017 14:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97F0126C23 for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 May 2017 14:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.0.24] ([95.120.184.119]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1BMy-1e73gh45Fo-00tCgB; Thu, 25 May 2017 23:19:00 +0200
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, Stefan Viergutz <viergutz@informatik.uni-bonn.de>, xml2rfc@ietf.org
References: <15c2788f4d0.281d.7a19c564b98a554439c08072c0c083c8@informatik.uni-bonn.de> <b87d41d8-c4ec-1e35-de81-eb823152c467@nostrum.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <12a1e67f-abb4-575a-1625-c8a31c677e62@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 23:19:00 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b87d41d8-c4ec-1e35-de81-eb823152c467@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:tym7lZLU9b+a5ebGJrpAVN57MfukDsjPKNS9PC3yvWeE1aWg3x3 uxYrzFFoz4HoMv+rrIPIOcC9xk43BktfMWL30BRD09A8zlXQ6Wy1Py2G5UlMVzuOlk6yQyS MLu8yTWptui9QklnDoMkQXZAWMjfgy4TxNantsDW/psJ7rBeSbHebeNxWGDCU7ra/w48NBn iWwAyasNASGobjBEdeQEw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:M8S2OILs5gc=:yvcKo/zeghDtHlAjWx8mKd VfOEoJfjZjB35EVPFf5YhjqMVMYqYA5sapwy+Erk7rDpnOgLcuYdPM37l2ENjPXpvrSkMlM0M EaPBSFK/77YfLd1oQJTR07NOBRZD41jkS0nznp20FpME9gDjsD9Rgc0EnhSn2aEw2SA1zKyP8 k205PWDkbKsjZGKlM2yspB28gfISto/cEKfuag0+KgeXLxZLk8D5jBIDPuP9Bxda8UVDJzoca Svus5IO6pvJv6D8w7W194pRqd1EJ4NAnhZqk7GawkMm1R+MzFkQ9a+FBX5PSGrF7/VWKpMIzY HX1W/MovB7nNwhVeDbrUfO/kt9Q08m0DmEdScLFalLlAnQwFkwbeGZU30MKL+GBzafHH2skG5 I3ajEAg5W8f9bG4VqklTg5UIx6wL/MEy+0Crn90Oiv20WG8axUiAOJ9bROT5lC6nQ78VTYl+A O+nIBNhfmX/14SjtPOWvC/5C92MJTVAoPotjZF3SqCRCkWRmD+NvglKNPdbiHioCcJMBnW4Tf mtp5va009ccNkJ8DvCw0VQeKX0r0gl+tD6mmz38/Mhhr4bvuC1Z/tRUAOx5jb6bN+dyfMRHre Y9HHtOWVD0b4bkVnNHXWD9zZ/eHhpZieipBQ2yBNv5ow0v1ttgfPYsC/lMl3a44ka/4AhiWNy beuO+/ySUFrt7XCiEt3vrYATkL0oF9FuAhJ8/kQQaZChLWZN3CycBDwrCcOCn11yHIOd3dQeX cWCXwNoQQZZJJpt1kTWSu+loWoRD6XOwfNYgCifmN/HTuk96KiZ2plVeeflj849+SR7QzomLQ PYR9WaL
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/53K2jVwzTXT02QfY-3GiEBTvsZc>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] [django-project] RFC Bibtex format doi numbering incorrect
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 21:19:14 -0000

On 2017-05-25 21:49, Robert Sparks wrote:
> Forwarding to what I hope is the best list...

Out of curiosity: why is it incorrect? Do we have a precise description 
about what the format should be? Hopefully including RFC#s > 9999?

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email