Re: [xml2rfc] RFC Bibtex format doi numbering incorrect

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 02 June 2017 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBAC12EBCF for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HahiHRSv5NNw for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D1E912953B for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.34] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLujU-1dFgQ72IrE-007lmm; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 16:53:03 +0200
To: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, xml2rfc@ietf.org
References: <20170602122943.2124.qmail@ary.lan> <d8469478-1c83-6bb5-5e0d-85413d473707@gmx.de> <C7D748F0-6891-4E4E-90C4-08A56915CFB1@amsl.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <c68840ec-ce49-179a-dfec-c8cc30ccad55@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 16:53:01 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C7D748F0-6891-4E4E-90C4-08A56915CFB1@amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:FPppuT5epFrRvHHvTqh91m5f/dgxUkZ8WI6n8Kfbay8RN2GBrkC Zl4tqH8ePuteXXR02JKkjQvdpopusYHAX838gmLZ4rJA/+k2N6aOLeubsuBRKxthm4dVvUz DYwVXiSprbQIV93vA/WEfhWcTUpIS19JB9b6SSmt710SL9DOegCDAhYeTql7TMbX0RFRHsX 0t9lXrbt6Xu/CeBqMfVMg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:gT/rIAc8aoA=:cgAYSewqt9wG5c+snyvEzz QMGgpT7RvlPxjRsxH5rUV6RhVbI8jKeCfGAA57Z7mZwCk5WAyAwAYifQ7NIG7sxpssz0vJjBw yWwGorHwb4v/jE8VwCRT2Z4noN9W59Ny+dT1dVRj40WZa+Z3c0s7AmDV92P6lXLn0BL/E56w6 08OrNFrkxIOkyRoZMsR9RR25GmeyFppuN82vvbrKTIJIbroXNPhVZY2H37jNNtG7Pl3sBdjPi Nbq9Vh8L7yIrY3kgTs82pF7NmLxdMGnstwmUy5mGSL5yDqq+N3vAaloHMQhwL59bSn7vyB7tN N7XCPPGE6TOcD2tEDqqzFDysWiwfpkosnYpJl0Xxdgtv+STPhWpPGSiXMGT1x567n60BeTS6o 2vbsABNVWVXPFgv/zG4FdT78Damno7al9SGGAdjFDwDDMqaBB2EzL2w+7d6NON7KYQmUN726l h4pCoT0ZLgGyBe2wlHebrSJvr/07RqC4Rr2ke0sdP2NO9mJ8rkH5rEWWJgESNFeUUIpPQhDga IN4Wr8MRDIEXnvgyCr6LG2NfAGfTSThc/gAV3y4Jrc8oLT6VVLmnzTIzYIW79s6XD6xkrrXhh PQC5BmeGAZmI6CYEmTwFm/8JOpR2TF6TbBIMpOId8Hr5iMC9sBY6JjHdH/gxSxA7O0qHa6agh IUm8LnLWzMcnMwli/oJNWV20esSPprHKGG9xwXhK+kHmX5umbMZ3lxZc3PSQk11qbjw9SZYWy UJLlRO/2cPSgNsOFXF8s7XF5Laqxd3aYawGvSSHrMbdXPUVdF4SKOjnuwP51QC+oi5gkcJAX8 8OIWqNt
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/z-2A6wfFbGjHPdUAJn-edvOm_fg>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] RFC Bibtex format doi numbering incorrect
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:53:38 -0000

On 2017-06-02 16:40, Sandy Ginoza wrote:
> Julian,
> 
> Did you use a script to check the DOIs?  Would you be willing to share with RPC so we can run it as part of our final checks before PUB?
> 
> Thanks,
> Sandy

It's part of the diagnostics generated by rfc2629.xslt. The output for 
the (XML-formatted) RFCs in AUTH48 can be found (as news feed) at 
http://greenbytes.de/tech/tc/xml2rfc/rfcdiags.atom>.

Best regards, Julian