IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xml2rfc] RFC Bibtex format doi numbering incorrect

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 28 May 2017 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871F3126CD6 for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 May 2017 08:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=6KqbwvPr; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=PJYPdk78
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P61_3qvwCQfU for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 May 2017 08:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (w6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236BE12426E for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 May 2017 08:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 81055 invoked from network); 28 May 2017 15:04:01 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=13c9d.592ae6e1.k1705; bh=+2TrDbh1SYL77Uy/XIGe3hy00ndBZn4PlkF/5Vl5CgE=; b=6KqbwvPrcGMUSKQxE6z+oinU7CuKU/AzloWOoKXPC8Ei4F/+Ruh0lSbDpeMOsl6miF4Dtq0t+smema0yN8lZabddNYE9Ftc/RLmrMxIT1jQgkjc/6PPL3fZDpHUe3NlJfkLMPJ31cXjqgdmXFU1/yF3I5OMRimQbPj236uTnTAhtjstCl3ccdIFzeF4X2VaYKK8vmsStBVdJRC+MCY2BtDOjkHweSJnadg9dh3bsLLCU7Z9ZKpBKWsNVDBi+l4q3
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=13c9d.592ae6e1.k1705; bh=+2TrDbh1SYL77Uy/XIGe3hy00ndBZn4PlkF/5Vl5CgE=; b=PJYPdk78zfUKf0dwjL+nWcSnRq8ff+fqnWDdQFy9oDzW1q6C2nVWEkdfupwAjwaxMhRizrwkuukC0EwNYgcc1MMZOFrFx6HAH5DbfAF+tODM3HSBHrpz4fOC9k+qQ4+oRVYEzp6qeYm3a3mwNfvsDQSaMWsuhtCn7L2+UDTmtnwAJ7M5KbKSlE6+mrMYLAT1Q0QZ9r29XJLZwrqALc29K7aSzC7PR26ywuGu5kcl4a9BpQDmtgzV/72khxfZnkhF
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 28 May 2017 15:04:01 -0000
Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 11:04:01 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1705281102580.45932@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, xml2rfc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <87shjphx4o.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
References: <87shjphx4o.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/vZdJOXlUXkKPZr8qq9uvcezhfVk>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] RFC Bibtex format doi numbering incorrect
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 15:04:03 -0000

> I don't know why, but presumably because it allows future flexibility.
> In any case, the DOIs for existing RFCs have been *assigned*.  If you
> use rsync to fetch ftp.rfc-editor.org::rfcs/rfc-index.txt,

It's easier to parse stuff out of rfc-index.xml in the same directory. 
Yes, Julian, there is a doi field.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email