IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xml2rfc] RFC Bibtex format doi numbering incorrect

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 30 May 2017 06:13 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BE81292FC for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2017 23:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JsmEE_rWaGXk for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2017 23:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20B8012878D for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 May 2017 23:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.66.43]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lj25i-1dmA3p2zF8-00dCFU; Tue, 30 May 2017 08:12:59 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org
References: <20170526165214.45384.qmail@ary.lan> <592C9B8F.2050504@levkowetz.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1705291809080.51625@ary.qy> <e79db540-0ddf-f8bf-f3c6-7890315fb814@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <c03fc23e-f288-6b33-def5-5d173e396382@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 08:12:56 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e79db540-0ddf-f8bf-f3c6-7890315fb814@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:3/r1t/68sdW0P+jsXqk1R6fOrS58EBy82I7GgdWZtAE88bf8pu1 Mlj5qBsLyTobqFiL/gJ6/xt3w+vl2vDoU4l12ECHfMHWJ+AaGhVlfb2oIR+FDrwqHtYEWuw X3RkamsL9CvQVaqWNmlF7mbu0sd0a6mln75gtgti5vT1qUiPnAZfdA2wPtQ1vPoRM2TIe5u zFt4Hy6VvUm23OR44JFLw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:1YXD+tnG39c=:PPVZmGTG+X0MFqTrfuxgNs 9fApes03s7vL+BSlEHOiT/DphAti3vK86nr89FPHy7f3q7Kdn5+6P/LYilNsOCEgE04D3oAYc 6hkW6u58d6bHa0ZVt3xncP6e6n3xNWS0NwU/W/eod9XIyOAgtDA45+GC9JZt347nLRJTV0xrX xhyrx5Lk5dUth1yttQJxyo5M1WLLDHwUD+HE/EUGfCs7wimuNhe1Fdi4GX5UV6oV6du1GkTRd GD8y6iIZWik8943+3s4P63fBgYhv87GEi4ubpDe+6q9rcefGfp/qZ/h0jbLPxY7hcYhvGhoyu G9u1sDtwpGvfaarwuL6pVXIYeRhoxO0vnG4343Q4tS39itQZS1LBmvpEu6USe2/FnE4BZExij k3qj+fpUyZfEsiJpqoJMHGKsX91Hax8bcchyPPnJfsraTdoyKGCDSHN8sAzjSD68+16vyzWDa Yg0MQ5KxGdIborYRtrPndYHIcrE+5h44ZoXWlG76Ky9LRNmaCmL3qaxj+NulI/l40M2d5knre rvt5PKu4GHE3tNRswS9be8kuYRlCApaGQWct7s+XLj6+MK9QcXS2NnTtYFlJf3oApxBdf6j2s tt7dt4F0m7dsEHlvinWOJ6zr+Nk43J8NGVfqeHceKErgQ8sdDfbhclIISAmalIDAgSU3iZvu7 2she/AnmKy1mBXzqXNWZU+mIr42uV2zYyOpGmo2fL73ksJOeBJKJ4fh1J1/JQI/sBjs/xSI9y f75e3XA8FeFtHSfj7gt3O1HLfx3sw/cj6qFCSMqvR+PMYsbXmUIuUbuEP/Hf3ISYUyxyZrdeN Gf6N2zl
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/4xiwD90Z-EpIvxVRi5B_3dEGlzc>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] RFC Bibtex format doi numbering incorrect
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 06:13:30 -0000

On 2017-05-30 07:44, Julian Reschke wrote:
> ...
> The code we're talking about is *validation* code. It works for all 
> published RFCs, and already has helped fixing broken references (when 
> someone else copy/pasted a reference entry together).
> ...

Speaking of which:

> rfc7800: Unexpected DOI for RFC, found 10.17487/RFC7156, expected 10.17487/RFC7516
> rfc7800: Unexpected DOI for RFC, found 10.17487/RFC7157, expected 10.17487/RFC7517
> rfc7800: Unexpected DOI for RFC, found 10.17487/RFC7159, expected 10.17487/RFC7519
> rfc7880: Unexpected DOI for RFC, found 10.17487/RFC791, expected 10.17487/RFC0791
> rfc7881: Unexpected DOI for RFC, found 10.17487/RFC791, expected 10.17487/RFC0791
> rfc7882: Unexpected DOI for RFC, found 10.17487/RFC791, expected 10.17487/RFC0791

With that, I'll try to stay away from this discussion.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email