[xrblock] after the IPR Disclosure related to draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 16 December 2015 10:55 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1F81ACE87 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 02:55:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H1e5hg9bFEEw for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 02:55:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E1931A876E for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 02:55:21 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2AgAwA3Q8ZV/yYyC4dbGQGCNCEsVGkGqW4GkzYJggSFL0oCgSY4FAEBAQEBAQF/C4QlAQEDEhtMEgEVFQtLJgEEDg0BGYgMAQysaaA6AQEBAQYBAQEBAQEBG4YfiWkBAR8xEYMOgRQFlQsBjiuEJYMLDI0Sg2YXD4N9bwGBDTqBBAEBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: A2AgAwA3Q8ZV/yYyC4dbGQGCNCEsVGkGqW4GkzYJggSFL0oCgSY4FAEBAQEBAQF/C4QlAQEDEhtMEgEVFQtLJgEEDg0BGYgMAQysaaA6AQEBAQYBAQEBAQEBG4YfiWkBAR8xEYMOgRQFlQsBjiuEJYMLDI0Sg2YXD4N9bwGBDTqBBAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,634,1432612800"; d="scan'208,217";a="156644576"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast-smtpauth.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.38]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 16 Dec 2015 05:55:20 -0500
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC04.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.14]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 16 Dec 2015 05:55:20 -0500
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC04.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.14]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:55:19 +0100
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: after the IPR Disclosure related to draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc
Thread-Index: AdE38D9G6xGjB4mWRa6CeaSXXvzLEw==
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:55:18 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEC8D0F@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.47]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEC8D0FAZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/Grv6tZrf0UCAPVgltAOh-pCbXeU>
Subject: [xrblock] after the IPR Disclosure related to draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:55:24 -0000

Hi,


As you may have seen an IPR disclosure that pertains to draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc was submitted recently. The announcement on the XRBLOCK mail list with  more information can be read at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/current/msg01914.html.



This I-D was on the agenda of the IESG telechat this Thursday 12/17. Our AD decided to defer this I-D to the next telechat scheduled for January 7, 2016 and asked us to confirm on the mail list that the WG still plans to proceed with the I-D.



Taking into account this new information - do the participants in the WG want to proceed with the approval of this Internet-Draft? Please state your opinions on the WG mail list until Monday January 4, 2016.



Thanks and Regards,



Dan